BenchLeader

Response time: seconds to a complete answer

Median seconds from request to the last token, reasoning included (Artificial Analysis). Time to first answer tells you when output starts; this tells you when it ends.

As of 9 Nov 2026, BenchLeader ranks Celeris-1 first on the Response time: seconds to a complete answer board at 3.9 s, ahead of Mercury 2.5 (5.6 s) and GPT-4.1 nano (6.3 s).

415 models · data as of 9 Nov 2026

Quality against what it costs to get there

Model size
40506070$0.0050$0.010$0.020$0.050$0.100$0.200$0.500$1.00$2.00$5.00$10.00$20.00What an average Intelligence Index task cost ($, log scale)BenchLeader Index v1.4Claude Fable 5.2Claude Opus 5.5Claude Fable 5.2NEW Claude Fable 5.2Claude Fable 5.2Gemini 4 CarbonGemini 4 CarbonGPT-6 AstraGPT-6.1 SolGPT-6.1 SolClaude Fable 5.1GPT-6 AstraGPT-6 AstraClaude Fable 5.2GPT-6 AstraGemini 4 ArgonClaude Opus 5.5Claude Opus 5.5Claude Fable 5.2Claude Opus 5Claude Opus 5Claude Sonnet 5.5GPT-6.1 TerraGPT-6.1 TerraClaude Fable 5.1GPT-6 AstraGemini 4 CarbonGPT-6.1 SolGPT-6.1 SolClaude Fable 5.1Claude Fable 5.1GPT-6 SolGPT-6.1 SolClaude Sonnet 5.5GPT-6 AstraMuse WonderGemini 3.8 FlashGemini 3.8 FlashMuse Spark 1.3Claude Fable 5.1Claude Opus 5.5Kimi K3.1 ProGPT-5.6 TerraGPT-5.6 TerraGemini 3.8 FlashGPT-6.1 SolGPT-6.1 TerraGPT-6.1 TerraClaude Opus 5.5GLM 5.3Qwen3.8 MaxQwen3.8 MaxDeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017Claude Fable 5.1GPT-6.1 TerraInkling 2 SmallGrok 4.7Claude Sonnet 5.5Grok 4.6Grok 4.6MiMo-V2.6-ProGrok 4.7Grok 4.7DeepSeek V4 ProGLM 5.3 FlashGLM 5.3 FlashClaude Haiku 5.5Claude Haiku 5.5GPT-6.1 TerraGPT-6 LunaMiniMax M3Muse WonderMuse WonderGPT-5.6 LunaClaude Haiku 5.5Grok 4.7Hy4Hy4MiMo-V2.6-FlashMiMo-V2.6-FlashStep 5 PreviewGLM 5.3 FlashMiniMax M3.1 FlashMiniMax M3.1 FlashKimi K3Kimi K3Muse Spark OpenMuse Spark OpenGemini 3.1 Flash LiteQwen3.8 27BQwen3.8 27BMistral Large 4Mistral Large 4Inkling SmallGPT-6 LunaGPT-6.1 TerraGemini 3.5 Flash LiteGPT-6 LunaDeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017Claude Sonnet 5.5Claude Sonnet 5.5Claude Sonnet 5.5Agnes 2.5 Pro ThetaLing 3.1 FlashLing 3.1 FlashQwen3.8 27BClaude Haiku 5.5Claude Haiku 5.5InklingInklingGPT-6 LunaGPT-6 LunaMistral Large 4Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55BNemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55BQwen3.8 27BGemini 3.1 Flash LiteGemini 3.5 Flash LiteClaude Haiku 5.5GLM 5.3GLM 5.3Inkling SmallInkling SmallMistral Medium 3.5Mistral Medium 3.5Muse GlimmerMuse GlimmerGPT-6 LunaNemotron 3.5 Super VLBeam 1.0Beam 1.0Qwen3.8 27BClaude Haiku 4.5DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017DeepSeek V4 ProDeepSeek V4 ProMistral Medium 3.5Nemotron 3.5 LightningNemotron 3.5 LightningGranite 4.2 8BGranite 4.2 8BMistral Small 4Mistral Small 4GPT-6 Luna
Purple: the frontier, the models no other model shown beats on both axes. Dashed ring: new in the last seven days.

The purple line is the efficiency frontier: at each price, the best index anyone reaches. A model above and left of the rest gives you more quality per dollar of real work. Size bands, task costs and token counts come from Artificial Analysis, which is the only source that publishes what a fixed batch of work actually cost and how much a model wrote for it.

205 of 205
#
1Kimi K3.1 Pro6.7 min2.7 min61.2
2Qwen3.8 Maxmax4.7 min2.0 min58.9
3Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B4.6 min1.9 min51.6
4Command A3.5 min–42.1
5Qwen3.8-Flash-Next3.3 min1.5 min54.4
6Claude Fable 5max3.2 min–65.3
7Ling Flash 2.03.2 min–46.8
8GLM 5.3 Flash3.1 min1.4 min56.8
9MiniMax-M13.1 min–49.6
10MiniMax M32.7 min1.1 min56.3
11Phi-4-Mini2.4 min––
12Seed-OSS-36B-Instruct2.2 min45.3 s49.2
13GPT-5.2-Codexxhigh2.2 min––
14Llama 3.1 70B2.2 min–40.8
15DeepSeek R1 05282.2 min1.2 min49.3
16MiMo-V2.6-Flash2.1 min37.6 s54.9
17MiniMax M2.72.0 min26.6 s56.5
18MiniMax-M22.0 min28.3 s52.6
19Qwen3.7 Plus1.9 min41.0 s57.7
20Kimi K2.6no reasoning1.9 min––
21Qwen3.5-4Bno reasoning1.9 min–44.0
22Solar Mini 41.8 min57.1 s–
23o4-minihigh1.8 min–50.3
24Qwen3.6 Plus1.8 min42.5 s59.1
25Gemini 4 Argonhigh1.8 min–65.7
26MiniMax M3.1 Flash1.8 min44.1 s53.9
27Deepseek v4 Flash Visionmax1.7 min53.7 s–
28Hy31.7 min43.2 s55.8
29MiMo-V2.6-Pro1.7 min22.0 s57.1
30Granite 4.2 8B1.6 min33.7 s41.1
31GPT-6 Astralow1.6 min–62.2
32GLM-4.6thinking1.5 min28.8 s51.4
33Solar Pro 41.5 min40.4 s49.5
34Ling 3.1 Flash1.5 min33.3 s50.8
35LongCat 2.01.5 min29.5 s–
36Claude Opus 4.8max1.5 min–60.2
37Claude Opus 4.6no reasoning1.5 min–58.0
38MiniMax M2.51.5 min15.4 s53.6
39MiniMax-M2.11.5 min15.0 s55.0
40Kimi K2.7 Code1.5 min28.3 s54.2
41NewInkling 2 Small1.4 min27.4 s58.3
42GPT-5.3-Codexxhigh1.4 min–62.9
43Claude Opus 5low1.4 min–57.0
44DeepSeek V4 Flashmax1.4 min40.1 s57.0
45Llama 3.2 Instruct 11B (Vision)1.3 min–35.6
46Inkling Small1.3 min26.5 s52.1
47Mistral Medium 3.51.3 min20.0 s46.6
48Kimi K21.2 min–51.0
49Gemma 3 27B1.2 min–39.9
50Step 3.5 Flash 02021.2 min27.8 s–
51Solar Pro 31.1 min21.6 s40.9
52Ministral 3 14B1.1 min–39.9
53Mistral Medium 31.1 min–44.3
54Kimi K2.5no reasoning1.1 min––
55Grok 3 minithinking1.0 min22.6 s–
56DeepSeek V4 Flash 0420max59.6 s15.2 s–
57Claude Fable 5.1low58.9 s–58.7
58GPT-6.1 Sollow57.8 s–60.2
59Step 3.5 Flash57.1 s23.5 s56.4
60Kimi K3low56.0 s3.1 s53.7

Cite as: BenchLeader, “Response time: seconds to a complete answer”, data as of 9 Nov 2026, https://www.benchleader.com/leaderboards/response-time.