BenchLeader

Claude Opus 4.7 vs GPT-5.4

Verdict
  • Claude Opus 4.7 leads on quality: 65.5 vs 63.4.
  • Claude Opus 4.7 is stronger in agents & tools, coding, composite, human preference, maths, multimodal, reasoning.
  • GPT-5.4 is stronger in instruction following, knowledge, long context.
  • GPT-5.4 is 1.8× cheaper ($5.63 vs $10.00 per 1M blended).
  • GPT-5.4 streams 2.8× faster (130 vs 46 tokens per second).
MetricClaude Opus 4.7GPT-5.4
BenchLeader Index65.563.4
Agents & tools score69.466.1
Coding score64.851.6
Composite score80.378.1
Human preference score68.864.5
Instruction following score58.571.7
Knowledge score66.466.8
Long context score65.967.6
Maths score65.2
Multimodal score65.764.0
Reasoning score66.362.3
Blended price $/M$10.00$5.63
Output speed46 tok/s130 tok/s
Time to first answer21.2 s126.4 s
Context window1M1.1M
Humanity's Last Exam36.2%
Terminal-Bench80.2%81.8%
SimpleBench61.7%
WeirdML76.4%
APEX-Agents34.9%
FrontierCode38.5%
GSO-Bench44.1%
Epoch Capabilities Index156.3156.9
LMArena Text14951466
LMArena Hard Prompts15191488
LMArena Coding15471514
LMArena WebDev15571386
LMArena Vision13171293
AA Intelligence Index40.739.0
IFBench58.6%74.0%
AA-LCR78.7%82.0%
MMMU-Pro78.8%78.4%
AA-Omniscience27.35.8
Terminal-Bench Hard51.5%57.6%
GPQA Diamond (AA)91.4%92.0%
Humanity's Last Exam (AA)42.3%43.7%
τ²-Bench Telecom (AA)88.6%87.1%
AIME (Vals)96.3%
LiveCodeBench85.1%
MMLU-Pro89.9%
IOI47.1%
LegalBench85.3%
CorpFin66.1%
TaxEval75.3%
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals)68.5%
SWE-bench (Vals)82.0%
GPQA Diamond (Vals)90.2%
Vals Index56.1
HiL-Bench41.7%9.7%
EQ-Bench 413111272
Kagi LLM Benchmark73.3%63.8%

Data as of 2026-09-09. Best configuration of each model; every score links to its source on the model pages.