BenchLeader

Claude Opus 4.8 vs GPT-5.6 Terra

Verdict
  • Claude Opus 4.8 and GPT-5.6 Terra (xhigh) are level on quality (64.7 vs 64.2).
  • Claude Opus 4.8 is stronger in coding, composite, knowledge, multimodal, reasoning.
  • GPT-5.6 Terra (xhigh) is stronger in agents & tools, human preference, instruction following, long context, maths.
  • GPT-5.6 Terra (xhigh) is 2.2× cheaper ($4.50 vs $10.00 per 1M blended).
  • GPT-5.6 Terra (xhigh) streams 1.6× faster (93 vs 58 tokens per second).
MetricClaude Opus 4.8GPT-5.6 Terra (xhigh)
BenchLeader Index64.764.2
Agents & tools score65.069.6
Coding score65.763.7
Composite score81.977.1
Human preference score65.666.3
Instruction following score61.665.0
Knowledge score66.360.9
Long context score65.366.0
Multimodal score64.463.0
Reasoning score64.258.2
Maths score71.0
Blended price $/M$10.00$4.50
Output speed58 tok/s93 tok/s
Time to first answer29.5 s32.5 s
Context window1M1M
SimpleBench64.8%48.9%
SciCode51.6%
Remote Labor Index8.3%
FrontierCode46.5%
ProofBench74.0%
GSO-Bench47.1%
Epoch Capabilities Index158.3
LMArena Text14731466
LMArena Hard Prompts15031491
LMArena Coding15271519
LMArena WebDev15401521
LMArena Vision12891269
LMArena Agent1.5
AA Intelligence Index42.038.2
IFBench62.2%66.3%
AA-LCR77.7%79.0%
MMMU-Pro79.5%
AA-Omniscience28.8-3.0
Terminal-Bench Hard58.3%62.9%
GPQA Diamond (AA)92.0%90.8%
Humanity's Last Exam (AA)48.7%41.9%
SciCode (AA)54.4%52.3%
τ²-Bench Telecom (AA)94.4%80.4%
LiveCodeBench87.8%85.9%
MMLU-Pro89.6%86.7%
IOI65.3%
LegalBench83.6%
CorpFin66.7%65.3%
TaxEval75.6%76.2%
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals)71.9%
SWE-bench (Vals)88.6%
GPQA Diamond (Vals)92.4%90.9%
Vals Index60.9
HiL-Bench35.3%
EQ-Bench 41281
ARC-AGI-194.0%
ARC-AGI-274.2%
ARC-AGI-30.7%

Data as of 2026-09-09. Best configuration of each model; every score links to its source on the model pages.