BenchLeader

Claude Fable 5.1 vs GPT-5.6 Terra

Verdict
  • Claude Fable 5.1 (xhigh) leads on quality: 70.3 vs 64.2.
  • Claude Fable 5.1 (xhigh) is stronger in coding, composite, knowledge, long context, reasoning.
  • GPT-5.6 Terra (xhigh) is stronger in agents & tools, human preference, instruction following, maths, multimodal.
  • GPT-5.6 Terra (xhigh) is 4.4× cheaper ($4.50 vs $20.00 per 1M blended).
  • GPT-5.6 Terra (xhigh) streams 1.6× faster (93 vs 58 tokens per second).
MetricClaude Fable 5.1 (xhigh)GPT-5.6 Terra (xhigh)
BenchLeader Index70.364.2
Coding score71.363.7
Composite score95.077.1
Knowledge score84.160.9
Long context score68.166.0
Reasoning score76.458.2
Agents & tools score69.6
Human preference score66.3
Instruction following score65.0
Maths score71.0
Multimodal score63.0
Blended price $/M$20.00$4.50
Output speed58 tok/s93 tok/s
Time to first answer132.0 s32.5 s
Context window1M1M
Humanity's Last Exam46.5%
SimpleBench48.9%
SciCode60.1%51.6%
ProofBench74.0%
LMArena Text1466
LMArena Hard Prompts1491
LMArena Coding1519
LMArena WebDev1521
LMArena Vision1269
LMArena Agent1.5
AA Intelligence Index53.238.2
IFBench66.3%
AA-LCR83.0%79.0%
MMMU-Pro79.5%
AA-Omniscience42.4-3.0
Terminal-Bench Hard62.9%
GPQA Diamond (AA)93.4%90.8%
Humanity's Last Exam (AA)58.7%41.9%
SciCode (AA)60.9%52.3%
τ²-Bench Telecom (AA)80.4%
LiveCodeBench85.9%
MMLU-Pro86.7%
IOI65.3%
CorpFin65.3%
TaxEval76.2%
GPQA Diamond (Vals)90.9%
ARC-AGI-196.5%94.0%
ARC-AGI-290.0%74.2%
ARC-AGI-30.7%

Data as of 2026-09-09. Best configuration of each model; every score links to its source on the model pages.