Gemini 3.7 Flash vs o3
Gemini 3.7 Flash 
o3 Verdict
- Gemini 3.7 Flash (medium) leads on quality: 64.5 vs 61.6.
- Gemini 3.7 Flash (medium) is stronger in coding, composite, knowledge, long context, multimodal, reasoning.
- o3 is stronger in agents & tools, human preference, instruction following, maths.
- Gemini 3.7 Flash (medium) is 2.3× cheaper ($1.50 vs $3.50 per 1M blended).
- Gemini 3.7 Flash (medium) streams 2.6× faster (277 vs 107 tokens per second).
| Metric | Gemini 3.7 Flash (medium) | o3 |
|---|---|---|
| BenchLeader Index | 64.5 | 61.6 |
| Coding score | 68.5 | 62.0 |
| Composite score | 79.2 | 54.5 |
| Knowledge score | 75.5 | 58.0 |
| Long context score | 68.1 | 63.8 |
| Multimodal score | 69.4 | 57.9 |
| Reasoning score | 63.5 | 61.5 |
| Agents & tools score | – | 70.3 |
| Human preference score | – | 62.3 |
| Instruction following score | – | 65.0 |
| Maths score | – | 78.6 |
| Blended price $/M | $1.50 | $3.50 |
| Output speed | 277 tok/s | 107 tok/s |
| Time to first answer | 4.4 s | 6.3 s |
| Context window | 1.0M | 200k |
| SciCode | 57.9% | – |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | – | 146.9 |
| LMArena Text | – | 1432 |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | – | 1441 |
| LMArena Coding | – | 1460 |
| LMArena Vision | – | 1214 |
| AA Intelligence Index | 39.6 | 20.2 |
| IFBench | – | 71.4% |
| AA-LCR | 83.0% | 74.7% |
| MMMU-Pro | 84.7% | 70.1% |
| AA-Omniscience | 23.7 | -15.6 |
| Terminal-Bench Hard | – | 37.1% |
| GPQA Diamond (AA) | 92.1% | 82.7% |
| Humanity's Last Exam (AA) | 39.0% | 20.1% |
| SciCode (AA) | 59.8% | – |
| τ²-Bench Telecom (AA) | – | 80.7% |
| PRBench Finance | – | 47.7% |
| PRBench Legal | – | 48.6% |
| MMMU (validation) | – | 82.9% |
| MMMU-Pro (official) | – | 76.4% |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | – | 67.6% |
| IFEval (HELM) | – | 86.9% |
| Omni-MATH (HELM) | – | 71.4% |
| WildBench (HELM) | – | 86.1% |
| MMLU-Pro (HELM) | – | 85.9% |
| GPQA Diamond (HELM) | – | 75.3% |
| HELM Capabilities mean | – | 81.1% |
| Aider Polyglot | – | 81.3% |
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | – | 58.4% |
| SWE-bench Verified (any scaffold) | – | 58.4% |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 91.2% | – |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 63.8% | – |
| BFCL Overall | – | 63.0% |
Data as of 2026-09-12. Best configuration of each model; every score links to its source on the model pages.
Gemini 3.7 Flash vs o3: questions
- Is Gemini 3.7 Flash better than o3?
- Gemini 3.7 Flash (medium) leads on quality: 64.5 vs 61.6. The BenchLeader Index combines every independent quality benchmark; Gemini 3.7 Flash (medium) is ahead overall as of 2026-09-12, but check the category scores for your use.
- Is Gemini 3.7 Flash better than o3 for coding?
- Gemini 3.7 Flash scores higher in coding (69 vs 62 on the category index, where 50 is average).
- Which is cheaper, Gemini 3.7 Flash or o3?
- Gemini 3.7 Flash is cheaper: $1.50 against $3.50 per million tokens, blended at three input tokens per output token.
- Which is faster, Gemini 3.7 Flash or o3?
- Gemini 3.7 Flash streams faster: 277 against 107 output tokens per second.
- Which has the larger context window?
- Gemini 3.7 Flash accepts more context: 1.0M against 200k tokens.