Muse Spark 1.3 vs Qwen3 6
Muse Spark 1.3 
Qwen3 6 Verdict
- Muse Spark 1.3 (xhigh) and Qwen3 6 (max) are level on quality (63.9 vs 63.3).
- Muse Spark 1.3 (xhigh) is stronger in coding, composite, knowledge, long context, multimodal.
- Qwen3 6 (max) is stronger in agents & tools, human preference, instruction following, maths, reasoning.
- Muse Spark 1.3 (xhigh) is 1.5× cheaper ($2.00 vs $2.96 per 1M blended).
- Muse Spark 1.3 (xhigh) streams 3.2× faster (190 vs 59 tokens per second).
| Metric | Muse Spark 1.3 (xhigh) | Qwen3 6 (max) |
|---|---|---|
| BenchLeader Index | 63.9 | 63.3 |
| Agents & tools score | 60.2 | 72.0 |
| Coding score | 70.3 | 58.2 |
| Composite score | 78.6 | 64.9 |
| Knowledge score | 75.1 | 64.0 |
| Long context score | 68.1 | 66.9 |
| Multimodal score | 66.6 | – |
| Human preference score | – | 65.9 |
| Instruction following score | – | 74.2 |
| Maths score | – | 64.2 |
| Reasoning score | – | 63.2 |
| Blended price $/M | $2.00 | $2.96 |
| Output speed | 190 tok/s | 59 tok/s |
| Time to first answer | 35.7 s | 38.5 s |
| Context window | 1M | 246k |
| GPQA Diamond | – | 87.4% |
| OTIS Mock AIME | – | 91.1% |
| SWE-bench Verified (Epoch) | – | 76.7% |
| SimpleQA Verified | – | 52.0% |
| SimpleBench | – | 63.0% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | – | 149.3 |
| LMArena Text | – | 1460 |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | – | 1482 |
| LMArena Coding | – | 1509 |
| LMArena WebDev | 1625 | 1479 |
| LiveBench | 81.6% | – |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 89.7% | – |
| LiveBench Coding | 81.1% | – |
| LiveBench Agentic Coding | 64.1% | – |
| LiveBench Mathematics | 96.0% | – |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 79.6% | – |
| LiveBench Language | 82.8% | – |
| AA Intelligence Index | 45.2 | 28.4 |
| IFBench | – | 76.6% |
| AA-LCR | 83.0% | 80.7% |
| MMMU-Pro | 82.0% | – |
| AA-Omniscience | 23.1 | 9.2 |
| Terminal-Bench Hard | – | 43.9% |
| GPQA Diamond (AA) | 94.1% | 88.8% |
| Humanity's Last Exam (AA) | 47.5% | 30.8% |
| SciCode (AA) | 59.7% | – |
| τ²-Bench Telecom (AA) | – | 95.9% |
| CorpFin | – | 66.5% |
| Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals) | 72.3% | – |
| SWE-bench (Vals) | – | 72.8% |
| Vals Index | 60.3 | – |
Data as of 2026-09-10. Best configuration of each model; every score links to its source on the model pages.
Muse Spark 1.3 vs Qwen3 6: questions
- Is Muse Spark 1.3 better than Qwen3 6?
- Muse Spark 1.3 (xhigh) and Qwen3 6 (max) are level on quality (63.9 vs 63.3). The BenchLeader Index combines every independent quality benchmark; Muse Spark 1.3 (xhigh) is ahead overall as of 2026-09-10, but check the category scores for your use.
- Is Muse Spark 1.3 better than Qwen3 6 for coding?
- Muse Spark 1.3 scores higher in coding (70 vs 58 on the category index, where 50 is average).
- Is Muse Spark 1.3 better than Qwen3 6 for agentic tasks?
- Qwen3 6 scores higher in agentic tasks (72 vs 60 on the category index, where 50 is average).
- Which is cheaper, Muse Spark 1.3 or Qwen3 6?
- Muse Spark 1.3 is cheaper: $2.00 against $2.96 per million tokens, blended at three input tokens per output token.
- Which is faster, Muse Spark 1.3 or Qwen3 6?
- Muse Spark 1.3 streams faster: 190 against 59 output tokens per second.
- Which has the larger context window?
- Muse Spark 1.3 accepts more context: 1M against 246k tokens.