BenchLeader

Qwen3.8-Flash-Next vs Step 5 Preview

Verdict
  • Step 5 Preview leads on quality: 65.0 vs 61.6.
  • Qwen3.8-Flash-Next is stronger in agents & tools, coding, multimodal.
  • Step 5 Preview is stronger in composite, knowledge, long context, reasoning.
  • Qwen3.8-Flash-Next is 6.2× cheaper ($0.230 vs $1.43 per 1M blended).
MetricQwen3.8-Flash-NextStep 5 Preview
BenchLeader Index61.665.0
Agents & tools score65.8
Coding score71.2
Composite score67.484.4
Knowledge score59.672.0
Long context score66.370.8
Multimodal score64.360.8
Reasoning score63.482.1
Blended price $/M$0.230$1.43
Output speed55 tok/s
Time to first answer39.0 s
Context window256k1M
LMArena WebDev1635
LMArena Agent-0.1
LiveBench76.2%
LiveBench Reasoning87.4%
LiveBench Coding72.5%
LiveBench Agentic Coding61.6%
LiveBench Mathematics85.8%
LiveBench Data Analysis74.2%
LiveBench Language74.6%
LiveBench Instruction Following77.1%
AA Intelligence Index39.943.6
AA-LCR79.7%88.3%
MMMU-Pro79.8%76.4%
AA-Omniscience-9.716.4
GPQA Diamond (AA)92.3%
Humanity's Last Exam (AA)38.0%46.5%
SciCode (AA)50.6%58.9%
CritPt11.1%20.9%
GDPval (AA)57.4%53.6%
τ²-Bench Banking (AA)45.4%

Data as of 2026-09-19. Best configuration of each model; every score links to its source on the model pages.

Qwen3.8-Flash-Next vs Step 5 Preview: questions

Is Qwen3.8-Flash-Next better than Step 5 Preview?
Step 5 Preview leads on quality: 65.0 vs 61.6. The BenchLeader Index combines every independent quality benchmark; Step 5 Preview is ahead overall as of 2026-09-19, but check the category scores for your use.
Which is cheaper, Qwen3.8-Flash-Next or Step 5 Preview?
Qwen3.8-Flash-Next is cheaper: $0.230 against $1.43 per million tokens, blended at three input tokens per output token.
Which has the larger context window?
Step 5 Preview accepts more context: 1M against 256k tokens.