Gemini 4 Argon vs Step 5 Preview
Gemini 4 Argon 
Step 5 Preview Verdict
- Gemini 4 Argon (high) leads on quality: 70.0 vs 62.4.
- Gemini 4 Argon (high) is stronger in agents & tools, coding, composite, human preference, knowledge, maths, reasoning.
- Step 5 Preview is stronger in long context, multimodal.
- Step 5 Preview is 2.8× cheaper ($1.43 vs $4.00 per 1M blended).
| Metric | Gemini 4 Argon (high) | Step 5 Preview |
|---|---|---|
| BenchLeader Index | 70.0 | 62.4 |
| Agents & tools score | 67.5 | 47.2 |
| Coding score | 72.1 | 65.6 |
| Composite score | 89.2 | 79.1 |
| Human preference score | 73.2 | 63.6 |
| Knowledge score | 75.7 | 69.1 |
| Long context score | 65.0 | 69.5 |
| Maths score | 71.9 | 61.1 |
| Reasoning score | 82.0 | 72.2 |
| Multimodal score | – | 60.0 |
| Blended price $/M | $4.00 | $1.43 |
| Output speed | – | 87 tok/s |
| Time to first answer | – | 25.9 s |
| Context window | 1M | 1M |
| SciCode | 61.8% | 58.9% |
| ProofBench | – | 42.0% |
| LMArena Text | 1525 | 1447 |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1551 | 1479 |
| LMArena Coding | 1562 | 1503 |
| LMArena WebDev | 1678 | – |
| LMArena Vision | – | 1267 |
| LMArena Agent | 9.3 | 0 |
| AA Intelligence Index v4.3.2 | 52.6 | 43.7 |
| AA-LCR | 79.7% | 88.3% |
| MMMU-Pro | – | 76.4% |
| AA-Omniscience | 42.4 | 16.4 |
| Humanity's Last Exam (AA) | 57.1% | 46.5% |
| SciCode (AA) | 61.8% | 58.9% |
| IOI | 100.0% | – |
| LegalBench | 88.3% | – |
| Vals Index | 68.9 | – |
| CritPt | 27.1% | 20.9% |
| GDPval-AA v2.1 | 56.3% | 54.2% |
| ITBench SRE (AA) | – | 55.6% |
| Analyst Agent (AA) | – | 35.0% |
| APEX-Agents (AA) | – | 38.0% |
| BioMysteryBench | 76.3% | – |
| Code Migration | 68.2% | – |
| CUA-bench | 4.8% | – |
| CyberBench | 77.9% | – |
| Excel Modeling Benchmark | 75.2% | – |
| Finance Agent v2 | 65.4% | – |
| Harvey's Legal Agent Benchmark | 19.6% | – |
| Legal Research Bench | 54.8% | – |
| MedCode | 58.8% | – |
| MedScribe | 87.4% | – |
| MysteryMechanism | 45.5% | – |
| ProgramBench | 2.5% | – |
| Public Benefits Bench | 69.8% | – |
| SAGE | 53.6% | – |
| SREBench | 44.3% | – |
| Tax Agent Bench | 76.2% | – |
| Terminal-Bench 4.0 (Vals) | 57.6% | – |
| Terminal-Bench Science | 44.3% | – |
| Vibe Code Bench v1.1 | 91.9% | – |
| LMArena Maths | 1528 | 1478 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1519 | 1406 |
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1529 | 1449 |
| LMArena Multi-turn | 1553 | 1453 |
| LMArena Longer Queries | 1545 | 1462 |
| FrontierSWE | 55.0% | – |
| Terminal-Bench 4.0 (AA) | 57.1% | 33.3% |
| AutomationBench | 77.5% | 51.0% |
| GDP.pdf | 21.8% | 14.8% |
| MLCR | – | 16.7% |
| EnterpriseOps-Gym | – | 47.2% |
| AA-Omniscience: accuracy | 49.9% | 41.5% |
| AA-Omniscience: non-hallucination | 84.9% | 57.0% |
| AA-Briefcase v1.1 | 1488 | 1425 |
Data as of 2026-10-11. Best configuration of each model; every score links to its source on the model pages.
Gemini 4 Argon vs Step 5 Preview: questions
- Is Gemini 4 Argon better than Step 5 Preview?
- Gemini 4 Argon (high) leads on quality: 70.0 vs 62.4. The BenchLeader Index combines every independent quality benchmark; Gemini 4 Argon (high) is ahead overall as of 2026-10-11, but check the category scores for your use.
- Is Gemini 4 Argon better than Step 5 Preview for coding?
- Gemini 4 Argon scores higher in coding (72 vs 66 on the category index, where 50 is average).
- Is Gemini 4 Argon better than Step 5 Preview for agentic tasks?
- Gemini 4 Argon scores higher in agentic tasks (68 vs 47 on the category index, where 50 is average).
- Which is cheaper, Gemini 4 Argon or Step 5 Preview?
- Step 5 Preview is cheaper: $1.43 against $4.00 per million tokens, blended at three input tokens per output token.
- Which has the larger context window?
- Both accept 1M tokens of context.