Claude Fable 5 vs Claude Opus 4.7
Claude Fable 5 Verdict
- Claude Fable 5 leads on quality: 70.4 vs 65.5.
- Claude Fable 5 is stronger in agents & tools, coding, composite, human preference, instruction following, knowledge, long context, multimodal, reasoning.
- Claude Opus 4.7 is stronger in maths.
- Claude Opus 4.7 is 2.0× cheaper ($10.00 vs $20.00 per 1M blended).
- Claude Fable 5 streams 1.4× faster (63 vs 46 tokens per second).
| Metric | Claude Fable 5 | Claude Opus 4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| BenchLeader Index | 70.4 | 65.5 |
| Agents & tools score | 74.4 | 69.4 |
| Coding score | 70.6 | 64.8 |
| Composite score | 91.6 | 80.3 |
| Human preference score | 71.3 | 68.8 |
| Instruction following score | 62.6 | 58.5 |
| Knowledge score | 71.3 | 66.4 |
| Long context score | 67.8 | 65.9 |
| Multimodal score | 69.6 | 65.7 |
| Reasoning score | 75.6 | 66.3 |
| Maths score | – | 65.2 |
| Blended price $/M | $20.00 | $10.00 |
| Output speed | 63 tok/s | 46 tok/s |
| Time to first answer | 92.2 s | 21.2 s |
| Context window | 1M | 1M |
| Humanity's Last Exam | – | 36.2% |
| Terminal-Bench | – | 80.2% |
| SimpleBench | – | 61.7% |
| Remote Labor Index | 16.1% | – |
| WeirdML | – | 76.4% |
| APEX-Agents | 45.0% | – |
| FrontierCode | 53.5% | 38.5% |
| GSO-Bench | – | 44.1% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 163.4 | 156.3 |
| LMArena Text | 1507 | 1495 |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1533 | 1519 |
| LMArena Coding | 1551 | 1547 |
| LMArena WebDev | 1628 | 1557 |
| LMArena Vision | 1330 | 1317 |
| AA Intelligence Index | 49.7 | 40.7 |
| IFBench | 63.5% | 58.6% |
| AA-LCR | 82.3% | 78.7% |
| MMMU-Pro | – | 78.8% |
| AA-Omniscience | 43.3 | 27.3 |
| Terminal-Bench Hard | 62.9% | 51.5% |
| GPQA Diamond (AA) | 92.6% | 91.4% |
| Humanity's Last Exam (AA) | 55.5% | 42.3% |
| SciCode (AA) | 61.0% | – |
| τ²-Bench Telecom (AA) | 98.5% | 88.6% |
| AIME (Vals) | – | 96.3% |
| LiveCodeBench | 89.8% | 85.1% |
| MMLU-Pro | 91.5% | 89.9% |
| IOI | 72.3% | 47.1% |
| LegalBench | 88.6% | 85.3% |
| CorpFin | 71.8% | 66.1% |
| TaxEval | 76.9% | 75.3% |
| Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals) | 80.5% | 68.5% |
| SWE-bench (Vals) | 95.0% | 82.0% |
| GPQA Diamond (Vals) | 93.2% | 90.2% |
| Vals Index | 66.0 | 56.1 |
| MCP Atlas | 83.3% | – |
| PRBench Finance | 53.9% | – |
| PRBench Legal | 52.6% | – |
| HiL-Bench | 56.3% | 41.7% |
| EQ-Bench 4 | 1340 | 1311 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 88.8% | 73.3% |
Data as of 2026-09-09. Best configuration of each model; every score links to its source on the model pages.