BenchLeader

DeepSeek V4 Flash vs Muse Spark 1.2

Verdict
  • Muse Spark 1.2 (xhigh) leads on quality: 64.1 vs 62.1.
  • DeepSeek V4 Flash (max) is stronger in agents & tools, composite, instruction following, long context, maths, reasoning.
  • Muse Spark 1.2 (xhigh) is stronger in coding, knowledge, human preference, multimodal.
  • DeepSeek V4 Flash (max) is 7.6× cheaper ($0.262 vs $2.00 per 1M blended).
MetricDeepSeek V4 Flash (max)Muse Spark 1.2 (xhigh)
BenchLeader Index62.164.1
Agents & tools score67.057.5
Coding score49.157.2
Composite score72.869.9
Instruction following score76.7
Knowledge score57.467.9
Long context score66.365.9
Maths score57.3
Reasoning score73.973.8
Human preference score70.6
Multimodal score66.0
Blended price $/M$0.262$2.00
Output speed212 tok/s207 tok/s
Time to first answer10.6 s22.3 s
Context window1M1.0M
SimpleQA Verified60.3%
SciCode44.9%56.4%
WeirdML45.6%60.3%
LMArena Text1500
LMArena Hard Prompts1513
LMArena Coding1536
LMArena WebDev1534
LMArena Vision1304
LMArena Agent-1.8
LiveBench78.0%
LiveBench Reasoning90.0%
LiveBench Coding77.5%
LiveBench Agentic Coding57.6%
LiveBench Mathematics91.2%
LiveBench Data Analysis76.5%
LiveBench Language78.6%
LiveBench Instruction Following74.3%
AA Intelligence Index34.539.8
IFBench79.2%
AA-LCR79.7%79.0%
AA-Omniscience-14.327.2
Terminal-Bench Hard35.6%
GPQA Diamond (AA)90.8%90.4%
Humanity's Last Exam (AA)38.5%45.5%
SciCode (AA)50.4%57.4%
τ²-Bench Telecom (AA)95.0%
MMLU-Pro88.3%
IOI21.8%
LegalBench85.3%
CorpFin70.9%
TaxEval80.4%
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals)69.7%
SWE-bench (Vals)86.6%
Vals Index57.0
AIME 202695.8%
HMMT February 202693.9%
MathArena Apex27.1%
CritPt16.6%17.7%
GDPval (AA)47.1%51.2%
τ²-Bench Banking (AA)39.4%34.9%
ITBench SRE (AA)31.5%
Analyst Agent (AA)25.0%
BioMysteryBench64.8%
Code Migration29.9%
Excel Modeling Benchmark57.0%
Finance Agent v260.6%
Harvey's Legal Agent Benchmark25.4%
Legal Research Bench43.8%
MedCode49.4%
MedScribe90.1%
MMMU-Pro (Vals)86.1%
MortgageTax65.4%
Public Benefits Bench68.5%
SAGE47.7%
SkillsBench53.0%
Terminal-Bench 4.0 (Vals)5.6%
Vibe Code Bench v1.179.1%
LMArena Creative Writing1452
LMArena Instruction Following1480
LMArena Multi-turn1520
LMArena Longer Queries1502
DeepSWE54.9%
LMCA35.9%48.4%
DTBench86.4%94.7%
GDP.pdf16.0%
FrontierSWE12.0%

Data as of 2026-09-19. Best configuration of each model; every score links to its source on the model pages.

DeepSeek V4 Flash vs Muse Spark 1.2: questions

Is DeepSeek V4 Flash better than Muse Spark 1.2?
Muse Spark 1.2 (xhigh) leads on quality: 64.1 vs 62.1. The BenchLeader Index combines every independent quality benchmark; Muse Spark 1.2 (xhigh) is ahead overall as of 2026-09-19, but check the category scores for your use.
Is DeepSeek V4 Flash better than Muse Spark 1.2 for coding?
Muse Spark 1.2 scores higher in coding (57 vs 49 on the category index, where 50 is average).
Is DeepSeek V4 Flash better than Muse Spark 1.2 for agentic tasks?
DeepSeek V4 Flash scores higher in agentic tasks (67 vs 58 on the category index, where 50 is average).
Which is cheaper, DeepSeek V4 Flash or Muse Spark 1.2?
DeepSeek V4 Flash is cheaper: $0.262 against $2.00 per million tokens, blended at three input tokens per output token.
Which is faster, DeepSeek V4 Flash or Muse Spark 1.2?
DeepSeek V4 Flash streams faster: 212 against 207 output tokens per second.
Which has the larger context window?
Muse Spark 1.2 accepts more context: 1.0M against 1M tokens.