DeepSeek V4 Flash vs Gemini 4 Argon
DeepSeek V4 Flash 
Gemini 4 Argon Verdict
- Gemini 4 Argon (high) leads on quality: 70.0 vs 60.6.
- DeepSeek V4 Flash (max) is stronger in instruction following.
- Gemini 4 Argon (high) is stronger in agents & tools, coding, composite, knowledge, maths, reasoning, human preference.
- DeepSeek V4 Flash (max) is 24× cheaper ($0.168 vs $4.00 per 1M blended).
| Metric | DeepSeek V4 Flash (max) | Gemini 4 Argon (high) |
|---|---|---|
| BenchLeader Index | 60.6 | 70.0 |
| Agents & tools score | 67.2 | 67.5 |
| Coding score | 47.4 | 72.1 |
| Composite score | 68.4 | 89.2 |
| Instruction following score | 76.7 | – |
| Knowledge score | 55.3 | 75.7 |
| Long context score | 65.0 | 65.0 |
| Maths score | 57.3 | 71.9 |
| Reasoning score | 68.8 | 82.0 |
| Human preference score | – | 73.2 |
| Blended price $/M | $0.168 | $4.00 |
| Output speed | 222 tok/s | – |
| Time to first answer | 9.9 s | – |
| Context window | 1M | 1M |
| SciCode | 44.9% | 61.8% |
| WeirdML | 45.6% | – |
| LMArena Text | – | 1525 |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | – | 1551 |
| LMArena Coding | – | 1562 |
| LMArena WebDev | – | 1678 |
| LMArena Agent | – | 9.3 |
| AA Intelligence Index v4.3.2 | 34.3 | 52.6 |
| IFBench | 79.2% | – |
| AA-LCR | 79.7% | 79.7% |
| AA-Omniscience | -14.3 | 42.4 |
| Terminal-Bench Hard | 35.6% | – |
| GPQA Diamond (AA) | 90.8% | – |
| Humanity's Last Exam (AA) | 38.5% | 57.1% |
| SciCode (AA) | 50.4% | 61.8% |
| τ²-Bench Telecom (AA) | 95.0% | – |
| IOI | – | 100.0% |
| LegalBench | – | 88.3% |
| Vals Index | – | 68.9 |
| AIME 2026 | 95.8% | – |
| HMMT February 2026 | 93.9% | – |
| MathArena Apex | 27.1% | – |
| CritPt | 16.6% | 27.1% |
| GDPval-AA v2.1 | 46.9% | 56.3% |
| τ³-Banking (AA) | 39.4% | – |
| ITBench SRE (AA) | 31.5% | – |
| Analyst Agent (AA) | 25.0% | – |
| BioMysteryBench | – | 76.3% |
| Code Migration | – | 68.2% |
| CUA-bench | – | 4.8% |
| CyberBench | – | 77.9% |
| Excel Modeling Benchmark | – | 75.2% |
| Finance Agent v2 | – | 65.4% |
| Harvey's Legal Agent Benchmark | – | 19.6% |
| Legal Research Bench | – | 54.8% |
| MedCode | – | 58.8% |
| MedScribe | – | 87.4% |
| MysteryMechanism | – | 45.5% |
| ProgramBench | – | 2.5% |
| Public Benefits Bench | – | 69.8% |
| SAGE | – | 53.6% |
| SREBench | – | 44.3% |
| Tax Agent Bench | – | 76.2% |
| Terminal-Bench 4.0 (Vals) | – | 57.6% |
| Terminal-Bench Science | – | 44.3% |
| Vibe Code Bench v1.1 | – | 91.9% |
| LMArena Maths | – | 1528 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | – | 1519 |
| LMArena Instruction Following | – | 1529 |
| LMArena Multi-turn | – | 1553 |
| LMArena Longer Queries | – | 1545 |
| LMCA | 35.9% | – |
| DTBench | 86.4% | – |
| FrontierSWE | – | 55.0% |
| Terminal-Bench 4.0 (AA) | 12.1% | 57.1% |
| Terminal-Bench 2.1 (AA) | 78.7% | – |
| AutomationBench | – | 77.5% |
| GDP.pdf | – | 21.8% |
| AA-Omniscience: accuracy | 40.4% | 49.9% |
| AA-Omniscience: non-hallucination | 8.3% | 84.9% |
| AA-Briefcase v1.1 | – | 1488 |
Data as of 2026-10-11. Best configuration of each model; every score links to its source on the model pages.
DeepSeek V4 Flash vs Gemini 4 Argon: questions
- Is DeepSeek V4 Flash better than Gemini 4 Argon?
- Gemini 4 Argon (high) leads on quality: 70.0 vs 60.6. The BenchLeader Index combines every independent quality benchmark; Gemini 4 Argon (high) is ahead overall as of 2026-10-11, but check the category scores for your use.
- Is DeepSeek V4 Flash better than Gemini 4 Argon for coding?
- Gemini 4 Argon scores higher in coding (72 vs 47 on the category index, where 50 is average).
- Is DeepSeek V4 Flash better than Gemini 4 Argon for agentic tasks?
- Gemini 4 Argon scores higher in agentic tasks (68 vs 67 on the category index, where 50 is average).
- Which is cheaper, DeepSeek V4 Flash or Gemini 4 Argon?
- DeepSeek V4 Flash is cheaper: $0.168 against $4.00 per million tokens, blended at three input tokens per output token.
- Which has the larger context window?
- Both accept 1M tokens of context.