BenchLeader

Muse Spark 1.1 vs Muse Spark 1.3

Verdict
  • Muse Spark 1.1 leads on quality: 64.9 vs 63.9.
  • Muse Spark 1.1 is stronger in agents & tools, human preference, instruction following, maths, reasoning.
  • Muse Spark 1.3 (xhigh) is stronger in coding, composite, knowledge, long context, multimodal.
  • They cost about the same ($2.00 per 1M blended).
MetricMuse Spark 1.1Muse Spark 1.3 (xhigh)
BenchLeader Index64.963.9
Agents & tools score62.760.4
Coding score68.270.8
Composite score72.278.6
Human preference score66.0
Instruction following score77.8
Knowledge score73.175.0
Long context score65.368.1
Maths score52.2
Multimodal score64.966.6
Reasoning score68.8
Blended price $/M$2.00$2.00
Output speed194 tok/s193 tok/s
Time to first answer2.0 s40.0 s
Context window1.0M1M
SimpleQA Verified57.8%
SciCode58.2%
APEX-Agents41.9%
ProofBench39.0%
Epoch Capabilities Index154.6
LMArena Text1492
LMArena Hard Prompts1511
LMArena Coding1531
LMArena WebDev15411625
LMArena Vision1293
LMArena Agent-2.6
LiveBench81.6%
LiveBench Reasoning89.7%
LiveBench Coding81.1%
LiveBench Agentic Coding64.1%
LiveBench Mathematics96.0%
LiveBench Data Analysis79.6%
LiveBench Language82.8%
AA Intelligence Index34.345.2
AA-LCR77.7%83.0%
MMMU-Pro82.0%
AA-Omniscience28.123.1
GPQA Diamond (AA)89.8%94.1%
Humanity's Last Exam (AA)46.2%47.5%
SciCode (AA)58.8%59.7%
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals)72.3%
Vals Index60.3
SWE-Bench Pro61.5%
MCP Atlas88.1%
MultiChallenge75.3%
PRBench Finance55.0%
PRBench Legal57.0%
MultiNRC65.6%
EQ-Bench 41260

Data as of 2026-09-09. Best configuration of each model; every score links to its source on the model pages.