BenchLeader

Claude Fable 5.1 vs Muse Spark

Verdict
  • Claude Fable 5.1 (xhigh) leads on quality: 70.3 vs 65.4.
  • Claude Fable 5.1 (xhigh) is stronger in coding, composite, knowledge, long context, reasoning.
  • Muse Spark is stronger in agents & tools, human preference, instruction following, maths, multimodal.
MetricClaude Fable 5.1 (xhigh)Muse Spark
BenchLeader Index70.365.4
Coding score71.366.0
Composite score95.068.4
Knowledge score84.164.5
Long context score68.165.5
Reasoning score76.470.0
Agents & tools score66.3
Human preference score69.0
Instruction following score79.6
Maths score56.3
Multimodal score65.9
Blended price $/M$20.00
Output speed58 tok/s
Time to first answer132.0 s
Context window1M262k
GPQA Diamond89.8%
OTIS Mock AIME88.9%
Humanity's Last Exam46.5%40.6%
SciCode60.1%51.5%
ProofBench17.0%
Epoch Capabilities Index152.1
LMArena Text1488
LMArena Hard Prompts1505
LMArena Coding1526
LMArena Vision1306
AA Intelligence Index53.231.3
IFBench75.9%
AA-LCR83.0%78.0%
MMMU-Pro80.5%
AA-Omniscience42.47.2
Terminal-Bench Hard45.5%
GPQA Diamond (AA)93.4%88.4%
Humanity's Last Exam (AA)58.7%40.7%
SciCode (AA)60.9%
τ²-Bench Telecom (AA)91.5%
AIME (Vals)96.9%
MMLU-Pro87.3%
LegalBench84.2%
CorpFin65.1%
TaxEval77.7%
SWE-bench (Vals)74.4%
GPQA Diamond (Vals)89.7%
SWE-Bench Pro55.0%
MCP Atlas82.2%
MultiChallenge75.5%
PRBench Finance52.4%
PRBench Legal52.3%
MultiNRC59.0%
TutorBench68.5%
ARC-AGI-196.5%
ARC-AGI-290.0%

Data as of 2026-09-09. Best configuration of each model; every score links to its source on the model pages.