BenchLeader

GPT-5.5 Pro vs Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B

Verdict
  • GPT-5.5 Pro (xhigh) leads on quality: 67.1 vs 65.2.
  • GPT-5.5 Pro (xhigh) is stronger in maths.
  • Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B is stronger in reasoning, agents & tools, composite, knowledge, long context.
  • Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B is 23× cheaper ($3.00 vs $67.50 per 1M blended).
  • Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B streams 9.5× faster (38 vs 4 tokens per second).
MetricGPT-5.5 Pro (xhigh)Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B
BenchLeader Index67.165.2
Maths score74.5
Reasoning score80.180.5
Agents & tools score78.3
Composite score79.8
Knowledge score66.3
Long context score66.6
Blended price $/M$67.50$3.00
Output speed4 tok/s38 tok/s
Time to first answer3.5 s55.2 s
Context window1.1M984k
FrontierMath Tiers 1–387.7%
FrontierMath Tier 478.0%
AA Intelligence Index40.0
AA-LCR80.3%
AA-Omniscience4.3
GPQA Diamond (AA)93.5%
Humanity's Last Exam (AA)42.5%
SciCode (AA)54.0%
ARC-AGI-195.0%
ARC-AGI-284.2%
CritPt30.6%20.0%
GDPval (AA)56.4%
τ²-Bench Banking (AA)49.1%
LMCA53.9%
DTBench96.0%

Data as of 2026-09-19. Best configuration of each model; every score links to its source on the model pages.

GPT-5.5 Pro vs Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B: questions

Is GPT-5.5 Pro better than Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B?
GPT-5.5 Pro (xhigh) leads on quality: 67.1 vs 65.2. The BenchLeader Index combines every independent quality benchmark; GPT-5.5 Pro (xhigh) is ahead overall as of 2026-09-19, but check the category scores for your use.
Which is cheaper, GPT-5.5 Pro or Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B?
Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B is cheaper: $3.00 against $67.50 per million tokens, blended at three input tokens per output token.
Which is faster, GPT-5.5 Pro or Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B?
Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B streams faster: 38 against 4 output tokens per second.
Which has the larger context window?
GPT-5.5 Pro accepts more context: 1.1M against 984k tokens.