BenchLeader

Claude Fable 5.1 vs GPT-5.5 Pro

Verdict
  • Claude Fable 5.1 (high) leads on quality: 72.0 vs 67.1.
  • Claude Fable 5.1 (high) is stronger in agents & tools, coding, composite, knowledge, long context, reasoning.
  • GPT-5.5 Pro (xhigh) is stronger in maths.
  • Claude Fable 5.1 (high) is 3.4× cheaper ($20.00 vs $67.50 per 1M blended).
  • Claude Fable 5.1 (high) streams 13.7× faster (55 vs 4 tokens per second).
MetricClaude Fable 5.1 (high)GPT-5.5 Pro (xhigh)
BenchLeader Index72.067.1
Agents & tools score66.6
Coding score74.1
Composite score94.0
Knowledge score83.7
Long context score68.4
Reasoning score81.080.1
Maths score74.5
Blended price $/M$20.00$67.50
Output speed55 tok/s4 tok/s
Time to first answer14.7 s3.5 s
Context window1M1.1M
FrontierMath Tiers 1–387.7%
FrontierMath Tier 478.0%
Terminal-Bench54.5%
SciCode57.6%
WeirdML92.3%
APEX-Agents44.4%
AA Intelligence Index51.2
AA-LCR83.7%
AA-Omniscience40.8
GPQA Diamond (AA)90.6%
Humanity's Last Exam (AA)55.9%
SciCode (AA)58.7%
ARC-AGI-196.0%95.0%
ARC-AGI-288.8%84.2%
CritPt30.3%30.6%
GDPval (AA)57.5%
τ²-Bench Banking (AA)43.1%
MirrorCode73.3%
LMCA53.9%
DTBench96.0%
CursorBench69.4%
ALE-Bench2143.2

Data as of 2026-09-19. Best configuration of each model; every score links to its source on the model pages.

Claude Fable 5.1 vs GPT-5.5 Pro: questions

Is Claude Fable 5.1 better than GPT-5.5 Pro?
Claude Fable 5.1 (high) leads on quality: 72.0 vs 67.1. The BenchLeader Index combines every independent quality benchmark; Claude Fable 5.1 (high) is ahead overall as of 2026-09-19, but check the category scores for your use.
Which is cheaper, Claude Fable 5.1 or GPT-5.5 Pro?
Claude Fable 5.1 is cheaper: $20.00 against $67.50 per million tokens, blended at three input tokens per output token.
Which is faster, Claude Fable 5.1 or GPT-5.5 Pro?
Claude Fable 5.1 streams faster: 55 against 4 output tokens per second.
Which has the larger context window?
GPT-5.5 Pro accepts more context: 1.1M against 1M tokens.