Gemini 3.8 Flash vs Qwen3 6
Verdict
- Gemini 3.8 Flash (medium) and Qwen3 6 (max) are level on quality (63.6 vs 63.3).
- Gemini 3.8 Flash (medium) is stronger in coding, composite, knowledge, long context, multimodal.
- Qwen3 6 (max) is stronger in agents & tools, human preference, instruction following, maths, reasoning.
- Gemini 3.8 Flash (medium) is 2.0× cheaper ($1.50 vs $2.96 per 1M blended).
- Gemini 3.8 Flash (medium) streams 1.5× faster (90 vs 59 tokens per second).
| Metric | Gemini 3.8 Flash (medium) | Qwen3 6 (max) |
|---|---|---|
| BenchLeader Index | 63.6 | 63.3 |
| Coding score | 63.8 | 58.2 |
| Composite score | 79.6 | 64.9 |
| Knowledge score | 77.7 | 64.0 |
| Long context score | 68.6 | 66.9 |
| Multimodal score | 68.8 | – |
| Agents & tools score | – | 72.0 |
| Human preference score | – | 65.9 |
| Instruction following score | – | 74.2 |
| Maths score | – | 64.2 |
| Reasoning score | – | 63.2 |
| Blended price $/M | $1.50 | $2.96 |
| Output speed | 90 tok/s | 59 tok/s |
| Time to first answer | 11.7 s | 38.5 s |
| Context window | 1M | 246k |
| GPQA Diamond | – | 87.4% |
| OTIS Mock AIME | – | 91.1% |
| SWE-bench Verified (Epoch) | – | 76.7% |
| SimpleQA Verified | – | 52.0% |
| SimpleBench | – | 63.0% |
| SciCode | 54.4% | – |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | – | 149.3 |
| LMArena Text | – | 1460 |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | – | 1482 |
| LMArena Coding | – | 1509 |
| LMArena WebDev | – | 1479 |
| AA Intelligence Index | 40 | 28.4 |
| IFBench | – | 76.6% |
| AA-LCR | 84.0% | 80.7% |
| MMMU-Pro | 84.2% | – |
| AA-Omniscience | 28.6 | 9.2 |
| Terminal-Bench Hard | – | 43.9% |
| GPQA Diamond (AA) | 93.5% | 88.8% |
| Humanity's Last Exam (AA) | 42.1% | 30.8% |
| SciCode (AA) | 55.1% | – |
| τ²-Bench Telecom (AA) | – | 95.9% |
| CorpFin | – | 66.5% |
| SWE-bench (Vals) | – | 72.8% |
Data as of 2026-09-10. Best configuration of each model; every score links to its source on the model pages.
Gemini 3.8 Flash vs Qwen3 6: questions
- Is Gemini 3.8 Flash better than Qwen3 6?
- Gemini 3.8 Flash (medium) and Qwen3 6 (max) are level on quality (63.6 vs 63.3). The BenchLeader Index combines every independent quality benchmark; Gemini 3.8 Flash (medium) is ahead overall as of 2026-09-10, but check the category scores for your use.
- Is Gemini 3.8 Flash better than Qwen3 6 for coding?
- Gemini 3.8 Flash scores higher in coding (64 vs 58 on the category index, where 50 is average).
- Which is cheaper, Gemini 3.8 Flash or Qwen3 6?
- Gemini 3.8 Flash is cheaper: $1.50 against $2.96 per million tokens, blended at three input tokens per output token.
- Which is faster, Gemini 3.8 Flash or Qwen3 6?
- Gemini 3.8 Flash streams faster: 90 against 59 output tokens per second.
- Which has the larger context window?
- Gemini 3.8 Flash accepts more context: 1M against 246k tokens.