BenchLeader
Menu

Gemini 4 Hydrogen vs Muse Wonder Full

Full profiles: Gemini 4 Hydrogen (Google) and Muse Wonder Full (Meta): every benchmark, price and rank.

Updated · Data from 7 sources

As of 13 Nov 2026, Gemini 4 Hydrogen and Muse Wonder Full are neck and neck on quality (63.4 vs 61.7 on the BenchLeader Index, inside the ±3.1 margin). Choose Gemini 4 Hydrogen for knowledge (69 vs 62) and reasoning (70 vs 66); choose Muse Wonder Full for agents & tools (64 vs 62) and coding (70 vs 69).

Key facts (as of 13 Nov 2026)

  • Gemini 4 Hydrogen scores 63.4 on the BenchLeader Index and Muse Wonder Full scores 61.7 (BenchLeader, 13 Nov 2026).
  • Gemini 4 Hydrogen costs $3.00 per 1M tokens blended (list price, 13 Nov 2026).
  • Of the 12 benchmarks both models have, Gemini 4 Hydrogen leads 7 (BenchLeader, 13 Nov 2026).
  • On Arena WebDev, Gemini 4 Hydrogen is rated 1704 and Muse Wonder Full 1724 (LMArena, as published by 13 Nov 2026).
Gemini 4 Hydrogen benchmarks high Google Muse Wonder Full benchmarks max MetaAdd a third model

Which to pick for…

The pick's numbers come first. Category scores on the BenchLeader scale (50 is the average model, 15 points one standard deviation). High confidence means a lead of half a standard deviation or more; under one point is called either.

Use casePickWhyConfidence
CodingMuse Wonder Full70 vs 69 category score; Arena WebDev 1724 vs 1704Medium
Agents & tool useMuse Wonder Full64 vs 62 category score; GDP.pdf (AA) 32.6% vs 30.0%Medium
ReasoningGemini 4 Hydrogen70 vs 66 category score; HLE-Diamond (AA) 54.9% vs 48.5%Medium
KnowledgeGemini 4 Hydrogen69 vs 62 category score; AA-Omniscience v1.1 43.7 vs 30.6Medium
Chat quality (human preference)–Only Gemini 4 Hydrogen has an Arena rating (68 category score)Not comparable
High volume on a budgetNeither flagshipA smaller model is usually the better fit: Cheapest good LLMs, Fastest LLMs–

Key differences

  • Gemini 4 Hydrogen (high) and Muse Wonder Full (max) are neck and neck on quality (63.4 vs 61.7, within the ±3.1 margin).
  • Gemini 4 Hydrogen (high) is stronger in knowledge, reasoning.
  • Muse Wonder Full (max) is stronger in agents & tools, coding.

At a glance

SpecGemini 4 HydrogenMuse Wonder Full
DeveloperGoogleMeta
Released12 Nov 202612 Oct 2026
Context window (tokens)1,048,5761,000,000
Compared atGemini 4 Hydrogen (high)Muse Wonder Full (max)
Open weightsNoNo
Price in / out / cached input per 1M$1.50 / $7.50 / $0.075–

Category by category

Category scores on the BenchLeader scale: 50 is the average evaluated model, 15 points is one standard deviation. A gap under one point is called level.

CategoryGemini 4 Hydrogen (high)Muse Wonder Full (max)Leader
Reasoning69.665.8Gemini 4 Hydrogen
Coding68.869.9Muse Wonder Full
Agents & tools61.963.6Muse Wonder Full
Maths67.8–not comparable
Knowledge68.562.3Gemini 4 Hydrogen
Human preference68.2–not comparable
Long context–66.6not comparable

On one chart

Each domain on the index's own scale, where 50 is an average model. Click a domain to see the benchmarks behind it. Pick up to 5 models from the list.

2550 avg75ReasoningCodingAgents & toolsKnowledgeGemini 4 Hydrogen, Reasoning: 69.6Gemini 4 Hydrogen, Coding: 68.8Gemini 4 Hydrogen, Agents & tools: 61.9Gemini 4 Hydrogen, Knowledge: 68.5Muse Wonder Full, Reasoning: 65.8Muse Wonder Full, Coding: 69.9Muse Wonder Full, Agents & tools: 63.6Muse Wonder Full, Knowledge: 62.3

Not drawn, measured for fewer than two of these models: Maths, Instruction following, Long context, Multimodal, Human preference.

Model, click to add or removeIndex

Where sources disagree

Across the 12 benchmarks both have, Gemini 4 Hydrogen leads 7, Muse Wonder Full leads 5. Every overall index that rates both puts Gemini 4 Hydrogen ahead.

Overall indexGemini 4 Hydrogen (high)Muse Wonder Full (max)Leader
BenchLeader Index63.461.7neck and neck
AA Intelligence Index v5.050.850.1Gemini 4 Hydrogen
Vals Index68.5†66.8Gemini 4 Hydrogen

Each publisher runs its own tasks, harnesses and effort settings, so their overall verdicts can differ; BenchLeader reconciles them on one scale. † measured at another effort setting of the same model (the publisher did not test the one compared here).

Price, speed and latency

List prices blended at three input tokens per output token. Per-task prices use the token counts on the methodology page. Cost, tokens and time per benchmark task are measured: Artificial Analysis’ averages over its whole Intelligence Index run.

MeasureGemini 4 Hydrogen (high)Muse Wonder Full (max)
Blended price per 1M tokens$3.00–
Input / output per 1M$1.50 / $7.50– / –
Cached input per 1M$0.075–
Price per task: chat reply$0.0029–
Price per task: summarize a 30-page report$0.022–
Price per task: code edit$0.020–
Price per task: agentic coding session$0.120–
Price per task: structured extraction$0.0045–
Agentic coding session, input mostly cached$0.056–
Cost per benchmark task (AA Index)$1.87–
Output tokens per task (AA Index)85k88k
Of which reasoning48k55k
Time per task (AA Index)8 min–
Output speed180 tok/s–
Time to first answer16.4 s–
Time to a complete answer63.3 s–

Each model is compared at its best-ranked reasoning-effort setting. Gemini 4 Hydrogen (high) scores 63.4 and takes 16 s to its first answer token. Muse Wonder Full (max) scores 61.7. Higher effort means more thinking before the answer: better scores, longer waits and more tokens billed. How reasoning effort changes scores and cost.

Every benchmark

75 benchmarks, grouped by category; each name links to the board and its leaders. † measured at another effort setting of the same model, shown for reference and not counted as a win.

MetricPublisherGemini 4 Hydrogen (high)Muse Wonder Full (max)
BenchLeader IndexBenchLeader63.461.7
Agents & tools scoreBenchLeader61.963.6
Coding scoreBenchLeader68.869.9
Human preference scoreBenchLeader68.2–
Knowledge scoreBenchLeader68.562.3
Maths scoreBenchLeader67.8–
Reasoning scoreBenchLeader69.665.8
Long context scoreBenchLeader–66.6
Blended price $/MBenchLeader$3.00–
Output speedBenchLeader180 tok/s–
Time to first answerBenchLeader16.4 s–
Context windowBenchLeader1,048,576 tokens1,000,000 tokens
Reasoning
Arena Hard PromptsArena (LMArena)1514–
LiveBench 2.0 ReasoningLiveBench88.6%†–
Humanity's Last Exam (AA)Artificial Analysis–53.6%
HLE-Diamond (AA)Artificial Analysis54.9%48.5%
CritPtArtificial Analysis–32.9%
CritPt v2 hard subset (AA)Artificial Analysis61.5%56.5%
MysteryMechanismVals AI–35.1%
Coding
Arena CodingArena (LMArena)1518–
Arena WebDevArena (LMArena)17041724
LiveBench 2.0 CodingLiveBench78.5%†–
SciCode (AA)Artificial Analysis–62.6%
IOIVals AI–79.8%
Code MigrationVals AI–61.0%
Code Migration v1.1Vals AI–62.8%
ProgramBenchVals AI–0.5%
SWE-bench MultimodalVals AI–47.3%
Vibe Code Bench 1-100Vals AI–34.0%
Vibe Code Bench v1.1Vals AI87.8%†86.0%
Terminal-Bench 4.0 (AA)Artificial Analysis54.0%57.1%
Design Arena WebsiteDesign Arena1316†–
FrontierCode 1.1 (AA)Artificial Analysis–44.9%
FrontierCode 2.0 (AA)Artificial Analysis36.3%37.8%
Agents & tools
Terminal-BenchTerminal-Bench56.4%–
Arena AgentArena (LMArena)–9
LiveBench Long AgenticLiveBench61.8%†–
Show all 75 benchmarks
MetricPublisherGemini 4 Hydrogen (high)Muse Wonder Full (max)
Agents & tools
LiveBench BrowserLiveBench77.1%†–
GDPval-AA v2.1, normalised scoreArtificial Analysis–67.8%
GDPval-AA v2.1Artificial Analysis–1857
CyberBenchVals AI–73.6%
Finance Agent v2Vals AI–59.1%
Finance Agent v2.1Vals AI65.1%†67.6%
Harvey's Legal Agent Benchmark v1.1Vals AI11.3%†23.3%
Harvey's Legal Agent Benchmark v1Vals AI–21.7%
Legal Research BenchVals AI53.9%†53.4%
Robo-benchVals AI–10.4%
SREBenchVals AI–11.8%
Tax Agent BenchVals AI52.3%†43.0%
Terminal-Bench 4.0 (Vals)Vals AI54.0%†58.1%
Terminal-Bench ScienceVals AI–37.1%
AutomationBenchArtificial Analysis74.4%71.3%
GDP.pdf (AA)Artificial Analysis30.0%32.6%
Harvey LAB-AA v1.1Harvey–13.1%
AA-Briefcase v1.1Artificial Analysis14971729
GDPxGDPx by SemiAnalysis–9.0%
Terminal-Bench-Science 0.1 (AA)Artificial Analysis41.4%37.1%
Maths
Arena MathsArena (LMArena)1495–
Knowledge
LiveBench 2.0 Data AnalysisLiveBench83.2%†–
LiveBench ResearchLiveBench86.8%†–
AA-Omniscience v1.1Artificial Analysis43.730.6
LegalBenchVals AI–87.4%
BioMysteryBenchVals AI–73.3%
Excel Modeling BenchmarkVals AI–71.9%
Excel Modeling Benchmark v1.1Vals AI75.8%†75.0%
MedCodeVals AI–49.9%
MedScribeVals AI–89.3%
Public Benefits Bench v1.1Vals AI–73.8%
AA-Omniscience v1.1: accuracyArtificial Analysis48.2%41.0%
AA-Omniscience v1.1: non-hallucinationArtificial Analysis91.3%82.4%
Instruction following
Arena Instruction FollowingArena (LMArena)1503–
Human preference
Arena TextArena (LMArena)1490–
Arena Creative WritingArena (LMArena)1492–
Arena Multi-turnArena (LMArena)1476–
Arena Longer QueriesArena (LMArena)1514–
Multimodal
LiveBench DesignLiveBench77.3%†–
Long context
AA-LCR v1.1Artificial Analysis–83.7%
MLCRArtificial Analysis21.1%†22.2%
Composite
LiveBench 2.0LiveBench77.0%†–
AA Intelligence Index v5.0Artificial Analysis50.850.1
AA Intelligence Index v4.3.2Artificial Analysis–55.8
AA Progress Index v1Artificial Analysis–343.2
Vals IndexVals AI68.5†66.8
Vals Finance IndexVals AI66.1%†64.5%
Vals RSI IndexVals AI–24.4%
Vals Science IndexVals AI–48.5%
Vals Router IndexVals AI–66.8%†

Data as of 2026-11-13. Best configuration of each model; every score links to its source on the model pages.

What changed

  • Gemini 4 Hydrogen (high): 10 new results (Arena Text, Arena Hard Prompts, Arena Coding…).
  • Muse Wonder Full (max): BenchLeader Index 62.6 → 61.7.
  • Muse Wonder Full (max): 1 score revision.
  • Muse Wonder Full (max): 1 score revision.
  • Muse Wonder Full (max): 1 new result (Arena Agent).
  • Muse Wonder Full (max): 6 new results (AA Intelligence Index v5.0, AA Progress Index v1, HLE-Diamond (AA)…); 2 score revisions.
  • Muse Wonder Full (max): 1 new result (Terminal-Bench-Science 0.1 (AA)).
  • Muse Wonder Full (max): 9 new results (Code Migration v1.1, Excel Modeling Benchmark v1.1, Finance Agent v2.1…).
  • Muse Wonder Full (max): 1 new result (FrontierCode 1.1 (AA)).
  • Muse Wonder Full (max): 1 new result (Arena WebDev); 2 score revisions.

Rankings: Best LLM overall · Best LLM for coding · Best LLM for agents · Best cheap LLMs

Gemini 4 Hydrogen vs Muse Wonder Full: questions

Is Gemini 4 Hydrogen better than Muse Wonder Full?
Gemini 4 Hydrogen (high) and Muse Wonder Full (max) are neck and neck on quality (63.4 vs 61.7, within the ±3.1 margin). The BenchLeader Index combines every independent quality benchmark; the two are within the margin of error as of 13 Nov 2026, so check the category scores for your use.
Is Gemini 4 Hydrogen or Muse Wonder Full better for coding?
Muse Wonder Full scores higher in coding (70 vs 69 on the category index, where 50 is average). On Arena WebDev, the top shared coding benchmark, it is 1704 for Gemini 4 Hydrogen against 1724 for Muse Wonder Full.
Is Gemini 4 Hydrogen or Muse Wonder Full better for agents and tool use?
Muse Wonder Full scores higher in agentic tasks (64 vs 62 on the category index, where 50 is average).
Which is better for long documents?
Both take about 1M tokens: Gemini 4 Hydrogen 1,048,576, Muse Wonder Full 1,000,000.
Do independent benchmarks agree on Gemini 4 Hydrogen vs Muse Wonder Full?
Across the 12 benchmarks both have, Gemini 4 Hydrogen leads 7, Muse Wonder Full leads 5. Every overall index that rates both puts Gemini 4 Hydrogen ahead.
More questions (1)
When was Gemini 4 Hydrogen released?
Gemini 4 Hydrogen was released on 12 Nov 2026.