Grok 4.7 vs Muse Spark 1.3
Grok 4.7 
Muse Spark 1.3 Verdict
- Muse Spark 1.3 (max) leads on quality: 69.4 vs 65.8.
- Muse Spark 1.3 (max) is stronger in composite, knowledge, long context, reasoning, agents & tools, coding, human preference, maths, multimodal.
- Muse Spark 1.3 (max) is 1.5× cheaper ($2.00 vs $3.00 per 1M blended).
- Muse Spark 1.3 (max) streams 4.4× faster (241 vs 55 tokens per second).
| Metric | Grok 4.7 (high) | Muse Spark 1.3 (max) |
|---|---|---|
| BenchLeader Index | 65.8 | 69.4 |
| Composite score | 87.5 | 89.7 |
| Knowledge score | 72.6 | 75.9 |
| Long context score | 64.8 | 68.0 |
| Reasoning score | 76.4 | 82.9 |
| Agents & tools score | – | 71.0 |
| Coding score | – | 66.7 |
| Human preference score | – | 69.8 |
| Maths score | – | 66.0 |
| Multimodal score | – | 67.4 |
| Blended price $/M | $3.00 | $2.00 |
| Output speed | 55 tok/s | 241 tok/s |
| Time to first answer | 1.4 s | 29.3 s |
| Context window | 500k | 1.0M |
| FrontierMath Tiers 1–3 | – | 74.0% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | – | 46.3% |
| LMArena Text | – | 1493 |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | – | 1516 |
| LMArena Coding | – | 1537 |
| LMArena WebDev | – | 1652 |
| LMArena Vision | – | 1315 |
| LMArena Agent | – | 4.2 |
| AA Intelligence Index | 46.3 | 48.1 |
| AA-LCR | 77.0% | 83.0% |
| AA-Omniscience | 30.9 | 25 |
| GPQA Diamond (AA) | – | 93.5% |
| Humanity's Last Exam (AA) | 42.3% | 48.7% |
| SciCode (AA) | 57.8% | 58.8% |
| IOI | – | 56.6% |
| LegalBench | 85.1% | – |
| Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals) | – | 79.0% |
| Vals Index | – | 64.5 |
| CritPt | 18.0% | 24.9% |
| GDPval (AA) | 59.7% | 58.7% |
| τ²-Bench Banking (AA) | – | 50.5% |
| Code Migration | 34.7% | 47.4% |
| Excel Modeling Benchmark | 54.9% | 67.4% |
| Finance Agent v2 | – | 60.0% |
| Harvey's Legal Agent Benchmark | 19.6% | 23.8% |
| Legal Research Bench | 39.9% | 55.3% |
| MedCode | 48.7% | – |
| MedScribe | 87.2% | – |
| MysteryMechanism | – | 36.0% |
| ProgramBench | 0.0% | – |
| Public Benefits Bench | 68.5% | – |
| SAGE | 31.0% | – |
| Terminal-Bench 4.0 (Vals) | – | 27.8% |
| Terminal-Bench Science | – | 14.3% |
| Vibe Code Bench 1-100 | – | 20.5% |
| Vibe Code Bench v1.1 | – | 85.9% |
| LMArena Maths | – | 1496 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | – | 1453 |
| LMArena Instruction Following | – | 1483 |
| LMArena Multi-turn | – | 1493 |
| LMArena Longer Queries | – | 1506 |
| LMArena Document | – | 1468 |
| Chess Puzzles | – | 38.0% |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | – | 25.0% |
Data as of 2026-09-21. Best configuration of each model; every score links to its source on the model pages.
Grok 4.7 vs Muse Spark 1.3: questions
- Is Grok 4.7 better than Muse Spark 1.3?
- Muse Spark 1.3 (max) leads on quality: 69.4 vs 65.8. The BenchLeader Index combines every independent quality benchmark; Muse Spark 1.3 (max) is ahead overall as of 2026-09-21, but check the category scores for your use.
- Which is cheaper, Grok 4.7 or Muse Spark 1.3?
- Muse Spark 1.3 is cheaper: $2.00 against $3.00 per million tokens, blended at three input tokens per output token.
- Which is faster, Grok 4.7 or Muse Spark 1.3?
- Muse Spark 1.3 streams faster: 241 against 55 output tokens per second.
- Which has the larger context window?
- Muse Spark 1.3 accepts more context: 1.0M against 500k tokens.