BenchLeader

Claude Opus 4.8 vs Gemini 3.8 Flash

Verdict
  • Claude Opus 4.8 leads on quality: 64.7 vs 63.5.
  • Claude Opus 4.8 is stronger in agents & tools, coding, composite, human preference, instruction following, reasoning.
  • Gemini 3.8 Flash (medium) is stronger in knowledge, long context, multimodal.
  • Gemini 3.8 Flash (medium) is 6.7× cheaper ($1.50 vs $10.00 per 1M blended).
  • Gemini 3.8 Flash (medium) streams 4.7× faster (273 vs 58 tokens per second).
MetricClaude Opus 4.8Gemini 3.8 Flash (medium)
BenchLeader Index64.763.5
Agents & tools score65.0
Coding score65.763.6
Composite score81.979.4
Human preference score65.6
Instruction following score61.6
Knowledge score66.377.6
Long context score65.368.7
Multimodal score64.468.9
Reasoning score64.2
Blended price $/M$10.00$1.50
Output speed58 tok/s273 tok/s
Time to first answer29.5 s13.8 s
Context window1M1M
SimpleBench64.8%
SciCode54.4%
Remote Labor Index8.3%
FrontierCode46.5%
GSO-Bench47.1%
Epoch Capabilities Index158.3
LMArena Text1473
LMArena Hard Prompts1503
LMArena Coding1527
LMArena WebDev1540
LMArena Vision1289
AA Intelligence Index42.040
IFBench62.2%
AA-LCR77.7%84.0%
MMMU-Pro84.2%
AA-Omniscience28.828.6
Terminal-Bench Hard58.3%
GPQA Diamond (AA)92.0%93.5%
Humanity's Last Exam (AA)48.7%42.1%
SciCode (AA)54.4%55.1%
τ²-Bench Telecom (AA)94.4%
LiveCodeBench87.8%
MMLU-Pro89.6%
LegalBench83.6%
CorpFin66.7%
TaxEval75.6%
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals)71.9%
SWE-bench (Vals)88.6%
GPQA Diamond (Vals)92.4%
Vals Index60.9
HiL-Bench35.3%
EQ-Bench 41281

Data as of 2026-09-09. Best configuration of each model; every score links to its source on the model pages.