BenchLeader

Claude Opus 4.8 vs Kimi K3

Verdict
  • Kimi K3 leads on quality: 66.5 vs 64.7.
  • Claude Opus 4.8 is stronger in coding, composite, instruction following, reasoning.
  • Kimi K3 is stronger in agents & tools, human preference, knowledge, long context, multimodal, maths.
  • Kimi K3 is 1.7× cheaper ($6.00 vs $10.00 per 1M blended).
  • Claude Opus 4.8 streams 1.6× faster (58 vs 37 tokens per second).
MetricClaude Opus 4.8Kimi K3
BenchLeader Index64.766.5
Agents & tools score65.067.5
Coding score65.764.9
Composite score81.974.1
Human preference score65.671.2
Instruction following score61.6
Knowledge score66.368.1
Long context score65.371.1
Multimodal score64.465.1
Reasoning score64.2
Maths score78.1
Blended price $/M$10.00$6.00
Output speed58 tok/s37 tok/s
Time to first answer29.5 s57.7 s
Context window1M1.0M
SimpleBench64.8%
SciCode58.7%
Remote Labor Index8.3%
APEX-Agents39.3%
FrontierCode46.5%44.2%
ProofBench87.0%
GSO-Bench47.1%
Epoch Capabilities Index158.3157.6
LMArena Text1473
LMArena Hard Prompts1503
LMArena Coding1527
LMArena WebDev1540
LMArena Vision1289
LiveBench79.2%
LiveBench Reasoning90.7%
LiveBench Coding81.5%
LiveBench Agentic Coding62.2%
LiveBench Mathematics84.4%
LiveBench Data Analysis78.7%
LiveBench Language85.5%
AA Intelligence Index42.043.8
IFBench62.2%
AA-LCR77.7%88.7%
MMMU-Pro80.5%
AA-Omniscience28.819.7
Terminal-Bench Hard58.3%
GPQA Diamond (AA)92.0%93.5%
Humanity's Last Exam (AA)48.7%46.9%
SciCode (AA)54.4%59.5%
τ²-Bench Telecom (AA)94.4%
LiveCodeBench87.8%
MMLU-Pro89.6%
LegalBench83.6%86.0%
CorpFin66.7%71.6%
TaxEval75.6%75.7%
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals)71.9%80.9%
SWE-bench (Vals)88.6%93.4%
GPQA Diamond (Vals)92.4%92.9%
Vals Index60.957.8
HiL-Bench35.3%
EQ-Bench 412811339

Data as of 2026-09-09. Best configuration of each model; every score links to its source on the model pages.