BenchLeader

Claude Fable 5.1 vs Kimi K3

Verdict
  • Claude Fable 5.1 (xhigh) leads on quality: 70.3 vs 66.5.
  • Claude Fable 5.1 (xhigh) is stronger in coding, composite, knowledge, reasoning.
  • Kimi K3 is stronger in long context, agents & tools, human preference, maths, multimodal.
  • Kimi K3 is 3.3× cheaper ($6.00 vs $20.00 per 1M blended).
  • Claude Fable 5.1 (xhigh) streams 1.6× faster (58 vs 37 tokens per second).
MetricClaude Fable 5.1 (xhigh)Kimi K3
BenchLeader Index70.366.5
Coding score71.364.9
Composite score95.074.1
Knowledge score84.168.1
Long context score68.171.1
Reasoning score76.4
Agents & tools score67.5
Human preference score71.2
Maths score78.1
Multimodal score65.1
Blended price $/M$20.00$6.00
Output speed58 tok/s37 tok/s
Time to first answer132.0 s57.7 s
Context window1M1.0M
Humanity's Last Exam46.5%
SciCode60.1%58.7%
APEX-Agents39.3%
FrontierCode44.2%
ProofBench87.0%
Epoch Capabilities Index157.6
LiveBench79.2%
LiveBench Reasoning90.7%
LiveBench Coding81.5%
LiveBench Agentic Coding62.2%
LiveBench Mathematics84.4%
LiveBench Data Analysis78.7%
LiveBench Language85.5%
AA Intelligence Index53.243.8
AA-LCR83.0%88.7%
MMMU-Pro80.5%
AA-Omniscience42.419.7
GPQA Diamond (AA)93.4%93.5%
Humanity's Last Exam (AA)58.7%46.9%
SciCode (AA)60.9%59.5%
LegalBench86.0%
CorpFin71.6%
TaxEval75.7%
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals)80.9%
SWE-bench (Vals)93.4%
GPQA Diamond (Vals)92.9%
Vals Index57.8
EQ-Bench 41339
ARC-AGI-196.5%
ARC-AGI-290.0%

Data as of 2026-09-09. Best configuration of each model; every score links to its source on the model pages.