DeepSeek V4 Flash vs Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B
DeepSeek V4 Flash 
Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B Verdict
- Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B leads on quality: 65.2 vs 62.1.
- DeepSeek V4 Flash (max) is stronger in coding, instruction following, maths.
- Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B is stronger in agents & tools, composite, knowledge, long context, reasoning.
- DeepSeek V4 Flash (max) is 11× cheaper ($0.262 vs $3.00 per 1M blended).
- DeepSeek V4 Flash (max) streams 5.5× faster (212 vs 38 tokens per second).
| Metric | DeepSeek V4 Flash (max) | Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B |
|---|---|---|
| BenchLeader Index | 62.1 | 65.2 |
| Agents & tools score | 67.0 | 78.3 |
| Coding score | 49.1 | – |
| Composite score | 72.8 | 79.8 |
| Instruction following score | 76.7 | – |
| Knowledge score | 57.4 | 66.3 |
| Long context score | 66.3 | 66.6 |
| Maths score | 57.3 | – |
| Reasoning score | 73.9 | 80.5 |
| Blended price $/M | $0.262 | $3.00 |
| Output speed | 212 tok/s | 38 tok/s |
| Time to first answer | 10.6 s | 55.2 s |
| Context window | 1M | 984k |
| SciCode | 44.9% | – |
| WeirdML | 45.6% | – |
| AA Intelligence Index | 34.5 | 40.0 |
| IFBench | 79.2% | – |
| AA-LCR | 79.7% | 80.3% |
| AA-Omniscience | -14.3 | 4.3 |
| Terminal-Bench Hard | 35.6% | – |
| GPQA Diamond (AA) | 90.8% | 93.5% |
| Humanity's Last Exam (AA) | 38.5% | 42.5% |
| SciCode (AA) | 50.4% | 54.0% |
| τ²-Bench Telecom (AA) | 95.0% | – |
| AIME 2026 | 95.8% | – |
| HMMT February 2026 | 93.9% | – |
| MathArena Apex | 27.1% | – |
| CritPt | 16.6% | 20.0% |
| GDPval (AA) | 47.1% | 56.4% |
| τ²-Bench Banking (AA) | 39.4% | 49.1% |
| ITBench SRE (AA) | 31.5% | – |
| Analyst Agent (AA) | 25.0% | – |
| LMCA | 35.9% | – |
| DTBench | 86.4% | – |
Data as of 2026-09-19. Best configuration of each model; every score links to its source on the model pages.
DeepSeek V4 Flash vs Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B: questions
- Is DeepSeek V4 Flash better than Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B?
- Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B leads on quality: 65.2 vs 62.1. The BenchLeader Index combines every independent quality benchmark; Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B is ahead overall as of 2026-09-19, but check the category scores for your use.
- Is DeepSeek V4 Flash better than Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B for agentic tasks?
- Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B scores higher in agentic tasks (78 vs 67 on the category index, where 50 is average).
- Which is cheaper, DeepSeek V4 Flash or Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B?
- DeepSeek V4 Flash is cheaper: $0.262 against $3.00 per million tokens, blended at three input tokens per output token.
- Which is faster, DeepSeek V4 Flash or Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B?
- DeepSeek V4 Flash streams faster: 212 against 38 output tokens per second.
- Which has the larger context window?
- DeepSeek V4 Flash accepts more context: 1M against 984k tokens.