GPT-5.5 vs GPT-5.6 Luna
Verdict
- GPT-5.5 leads on quality: 66.7 vs 59.4.
- GPT-5.5 is stronger in agents & tools, composite, human preference, instruction following, knowledge, long context, multimodal, reasoning.
- GPT-5.6 Luna (xhigh) is stronger in coding.
- GPT-5.6 Luna (xhigh) is 25× cheaper ($0.450 vs $11.25 per 1M blended).
| Metric | GPT-5.5 | GPT-5.6 Luna (xhigh) |
|---|---|---|
| BenchLeader Index | 66.7 | 59.4 |
| Agents & tools score | 68.5 | 50.1 |
| Coding score | 57.2 | 60.0 |
| Composite score | 77.8 | 72.9 |
| Human preference score | 67.9 | 65.0 |
| Instruction following score | 73.6 | – |
| Knowledge score | 73.9 | 59.0 |
| Long context score | 68.8 | 67.4 |
| Multimodal score | 64.9 | 61.6 |
| Reasoning score | 70.1 | 53.9 |
| Blended price $/M | $11.25 | $0.450 |
| Output speed | 85 tok/s | 107 tok/s |
| Time to first answer | 58.6 s | 55.4 s |
| Context window | 1.1M | 1M |
| Terminal-Bench | 84.7% | – |
| SimpleBench | 69.0% | 46.8% |
| SciCode | – | 50.0% |
| Remote Labor Index | 6.3% | – |
| APEX-Agents | 38.5% | – |
| FrontierCode | 43.0% | – |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 159.1 | – |
| LMArena Text | 1477 | 1453 |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1498 | 1473 |
| LMArena Coding | 1509 | 1497 |
| LMArena WebDev | 1458 | 1520 |
| LMArena Vision | 1296 | 1254 |
| LMArena Agent | 3 | 1.1 |
| AA Intelligence Index | 38.6 | 34.8 |
| IFBench | 75.8% | – |
| AA-LCR | 84.3% | 81.7% |
| MMMU-Pro | 79.9% | 78.5% |
| AA-Omniscience | 20.5 | -10.8 |
| Terminal-Bench Hard | 60.6% | – |
| GPQA Diamond (AA) | 93.5% | 89.5% |
| Humanity's Last Exam (AA) | 45.8% | 37.0% |
| SciCode (AA) | 55.8% | 50.5% |
| τ²-Bench Telecom (AA) | 93.9% | – |
| HiL-Bench | 39.7% | – |
| EQ-Bench 4 | 1315 | – |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 88.8% | – |
| ARC-AGI-1 | – | 87.7% |
| ARC-AGI-2 | – | 47.6% |
| ARC-AGI-3 | – | 0.0% |
Data as of 2026-09-10. Best configuration of each model; every score links to its source on the model pages.
GPT-5.5 vs GPT-5.6 Luna: questions
- Is GPT-5.5 better than GPT-5.6 Luna?
- GPT-5.5 leads on quality: 66.7 vs 59.4. The BenchLeader Index combines every independent quality benchmark; GPT-5.5 is ahead overall as of 2026-09-10, but check the category scores for your use.
- Is GPT-5.5 better than GPT-5.6 Luna for coding?
- GPT-5.6 Luna scores higher in coding (60 vs 57 on the category index, where 50 is average).
- Is GPT-5.5 better than GPT-5.6 Luna for agentic tasks?
- GPT-5.5 scores higher in agentic tasks (69 vs 50 on the category index, where 50 is average).
- Which is cheaper, GPT-5.5 or GPT-5.6 Luna?
- GPT-5.6 Luna is cheaper: $0.450 against $11.25 per million tokens, blended at three input tokens per output token.
- Which is faster, GPT-5.5 or GPT-5.6 Luna?
- GPT-5.6 Luna streams faster: 107 against 85 output tokens per second.
- Which has the larger context window?
- GPT-5.5 accepts more context: 1.1M against 1M tokens.