BenchLeader

Claude Opus 5.5 vs Grok 4.6

Verdict
  • Claude Opus 5.5 (thinking) leads on quality: 70.7 vs 65.5.
  • Claude Opus 5.5 (thinking) is stronger in composite, knowledge, long context, multimodal, reasoning.
  • Grok 4.6 (medium) is stronger in agents & tools, coding.
  • Grok 4.6 (medium) is 2.7× cheaper ($3.00 vs $8.00 per 1M blended).
MetricClaude Opus 5.5 (thinking)Grok 4.6 (medium)
BenchLeader Index70.765.5
Composite score95.081.4
Knowledge score85.076.4
Long context score68.566.6
Multimodal score71.9
Reasoning score95.066.9
Agents & tools score73.3
Coding score63.1
Blended price $/M$8.00$3.00
Output speed48 tok/s59 tok/s
Time to first answer4.2 s35.3 s
Context window1M500k
SciCode54.6%
AA Intelligence Index57.642.8
AA-LCR84.7%81.0%
MMMU-Pro87.7%
AA-Omniscience46.428
GPQA Diamond (AA)93.5%
Humanity's Last Exam (AA)61.4%42.1%
SciCode (AA)66.9%55.9%
ARC-AGI-187.5%
ARC-AGI-261.3%
CritPt31.7%17.7%
GDPval (AA)67.3%55.2%
τ²-Bench Banking (AA)44.3%
DeepSWE67.5%
CursorBench36.1%
Terminal-Bench 4.0 (AA)59.6%13.1%
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (AA)84.3%
AutomationBench69.5%
GDP.pdf26.2%
Harvey LAB91.2%
AA-Omniscience: accuracy66.2%41.9%
AA-Omniscience: non-hallucination41.4%76.0%
AA-Briefcase1822

Data as of 2026-09-22. Best configuration of each model; every score links to its source on the model pages.

Claude Opus 5.5 vs Grok 4.6: questions

Is Claude Opus 5.5 better than Grok 4.6?
Claude Opus 5.5 (thinking) leads on quality: 70.7 vs 65.5. The BenchLeader Index combines every independent quality benchmark; Claude Opus 5.5 (thinking) is ahead overall as of 2026-09-22, but check the category scores for your use.
Which is cheaper, Claude Opus 5.5 or Grok 4.6?
Grok 4.6 is cheaper: $3.00 against $8.00 per million tokens, blended at three input tokens per output token.
Which is faster, Claude Opus 5.5 or Grok 4.6?
Grok 4.6 streams faster: 59 against 48 output tokens per second.
Which has the larger context window?
Claude Opus 5.5 accepts more context: 1M against 500k tokens.