GPT-5.6 Sol vs Qwen3.7 Plus
GPT-5.6 Sol 
Qwen3.7 Plus Verdict
- GPT-5.6 Sol (high) leads on quality: 68.2 vs 59.8.
- GPT-5.6 Sol (high) is stronger in agents & tools, coding, composite, knowledge, long context, multimodal.
- Qwen3.7 Plus is stronger in instruction following, reasoning, human preference, maths.
- Qwen3.7 Plus is 7.1× cheaper ($1.13 vs $8.00 per 1M blended).
| Metric | GPT-5.6 Sol (high) | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| BenchLeader Index | 68.2 | 59.8 |
| Agents & tools score | 87.9 | 45.0 |
| Coding score | 72.4 | 46.7 |
| Composite score | 82.7 | 61.6 |
| Instruction following score | 67.8 | 75.4 |
| Knowledge score | 73.8 | 64.7 |
| Long context score | 67.4 | 62.9 |
| Multimodal score | 66.4 | 64.3 |
| Reasoning score | 63.3 | 64.3 |
| Human preference score | – | 65.3 |
| Maths score | – | 65.2 |
| Blended price $/M | $8.00 | $1.13 |
| Output speed | 59 tok/s | 57 tok/s |
| Time to first answer | 31.0 s | 37.3 s |
| Context window | 1M | 1M |
| GPQA Diamond | – | 87.9% |
| OTIS Mock AIME | – | 93.3% |
| OSWorld-Verified 2.0 | – | 2.8% |
| SciCode | 56.9% | 45.5% |
| WeirdML | 88.8% | – |
| FrontierCode | – | 10.2% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | – | 147.4 |
| LMArena Text | – | 1455 |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | – | 1473 |
| LMArena Coding | – | 1500 |
| LMArena Vision | – | 1281 |
| LMArena Agent | – | -5.2 |
| AA Intelligence Index | 42.5 | 25.8 |
| IFBench | 69.2% | 78.0% |
| AA-LCR | 81.7% | 73.0% |
| MMMU-Pro | 81.8% | 80.5% |
| AA-Omniscience | 20.4 | 1.1 |
| Terminal-Bench Hard | 62.1% | 47.0% |
| GPQA Diamond (AA) | 92.8% | 90.0% |
| Humanity's Last Exam (AA) | 46.0% | 35.6% |
| SciCode (AA) | 57.8% | 46.1% |
| τ²-Bench Telecom (AA) | 83.3% | 93.0% |
| Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals) | – | 52.8% |
| Vals Index | – | 38.6 |
| EnigmaEval | 37.1% | – |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 97.0% | – |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 85.4% | – |
| ARC-AGI-3 | 2.2% | – |
Data as of 2026-09-10. Best configuration of each model; every score links to its source on the model pages.
GPT-5.6 Sol vs Qwen3.7 Plus: questions
- Is GPT-5.6 Sol better than Qwen3.7 Plus?
- GPT-5.6 Sol (high) leads on quality: 68.2 vs 59.8. The BenchLeader Index combines every independent quality benchmark; GPT-5.6 Sol (high) is ahead overall as of 2026-09-10, but check the category scores for your use.
- Is GPT-5.6 Sol better than Qwen3.7 Plus for coding?
- GPT-5.6 Sol scores higher in coding (72 vs 47 on the category index, where 50 is average).
- Is GPT-5.6 Sol better than Qwen3.7 Plus for agentic tasks?
- GPT-5.6 Sol scores higher in agentic tasks (88 vs 45 on the category index, where 50 is average).
- Which is cheaper, GPT-5.6 Sol or Qwen3.7 Plus?
- Qwen3.7 Plus is cheaper: $1.13 against $8.00 per million tokens, blended at three input tokens per output token.
- Which is faster, GPT-5.6 Sol or Qwen3.7 Plus?
- GPT-5.6 Sol streams faster: 59 against 57 output tokens per second.
- Which has the larger context window?
- Both accept 1M tokens of context.