BenchLeader

Agnes 2.5 Pro Beta vs Claude Fable 5

Verdict
  • Claude Fable 5 (thinking) leads on quality: 70.9 vs 60.8.
  • Agnes 2.5 Pro Beta is stronger in long context, multimodal.
  • Claude Fable 5 (thinking) is stronger in agents & tools, composite, knowledge, reasoning, instruction following.
  • Agnes 2.5 Pro Beta is 133× cheaper ($0.150 vs $20.00 per 1M blended).
MetricAgnes 2.5 Pro BetaClaude Fable 5 (thinking)
BenchLeader Index60.870.9
Agents & tools score64.474.1
Composite score73.792.1
Knowledge score59.284.9
Long context score68.067.7
Multimodal score59.8
Reasoning score72.290.8
Instruction following score63.0
Blended price $/M$0.150$20.00
Output speed57 tok/s
Time to first answer108.4 s
Context window1M1M
AA Intelligence Index35.249.7
IFBench63.5%
AA-LCR83.0%82.3%
MMMU-Pro75.4%
AA-Omniscience-10.543.3
Terminal-Bench Hard62.9%
GPQA Diamond (AA)90.5%92.6%
Humanity's Last Exam (AA)37.5%55.5%
SciCode (AA)48.8%61.0%
τ²-Bench Telecom (AA)98.5%
Kagi LLM Benchmark91.4%
CritPt15.7%28.6%
GDPval (AA)43.8%56.6%
τ²-Bench Banking (AA)35.7%38.1%
Analyst Agent (AA)48.8%

Data as of 2026-09-19. Best configuration of each model; every score links to its source on the model pages.

Agnes 2.5 Pro Beta vs Claude Fable 5: questions

Is Agnes 2.5 Pro Beta better than Claude Fable 5?
Claude Fable 5 (thinking) leads on quality: 70.9 vs 60.8. The BenchLeader Index combines every independent quality benchmark; Claude Fable 5 (thinking) is ahead overall as of 2026-09-19, but check the category scores for your use.
Is Agnes 2.5 Pro Beta better than Claude Fable 5 for agentic tasks?
Claude Fable 5 scores higher in agentic tasks (74 vs 64 on the category index, where 50 is average).
Which is cheaper, Agnes 2.5 Pro Beta or Claude Fable 5?
Agnes 2.5 Pro Beta is cheaper: $0.150 against $20.00 per million tokens, blended at three input tokens per output token.
Which has the larger context window?
Both accept 1M tokens of context.