Claude Fable 5 vs Kimi K3
Claude Fable 5 
Kimi K3 Verdict
- Claude Fable 5 leads on quality: 70.4 vs 66.5.
- Claude Fable 5 is stronger in agents & tools, coding, composite, human preference, instruction following, knowledge, multimodal, reasoning.
- Kimi K3 is stronger in long context, maths.
- Kimi K3 is 3.3× cheaper ($6.00 vs $20.00 per 1M blended).
- Claude Fable 5 streams 1.7× faster (63 vs 37 tokens per second).
| Metric | Claude Fable 5 | Kimi K3 |
|---|---|---|
| BenchLeader Index | 70.4 | 66.5 |
| Agents & tools score | 74.4 | 67.5 |
| Coding score | 70.6 | 64.9 |
| Composite score | 91.6 | 74.1 |
| Human preference score | 71.3 | 71.2 |
| Instruction following score | 62.6 | – |
| Knowledge score | 71.3 | 68.1 |
| Long context score | 67.8 | 71.1 |
| Multimodal score | 69.6 | 65.1 |
| Reasoning score | 75.6 | – |
| Maths score | – | 78.1 |
| Blended price $/M | $20.00 | $6.00 |
| Output speed | 63 tok/s | 37 tok/s |
| Time to first answer | 92.2 s | 57.7 s |
| Context window | 1M | 1.0M |
| SciCode | – | 58.7% |
| Remote Labor Index | 16.1% | – |
| APEX-Agents | 45.0% | 39.3% |
| FrontierCode | 53.5% | 44.2% |
| ProofBench | – | 87.0% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 163.4 | 157.6 |
| LMArena Text | 1507 | – |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1533 | – |
| LMArena Coding | 1551 | – |
| LMArena WebDev | 1628 | – |
| LMArena Vision | 1330 | – |
| LiveBench | – | 79.2% |
| LiveBench Reasoning | – | 90.7% |
| LiveBench Coding | – | 81.5% |
| LiveBench Agentic Coding | – | 62.2% |
| LiveBench Mathematics | – | 84.4% |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | – | 78.7% |
| LiveBench Language | – | 85.5% |
| AA Intelligence Index | 49.7 | 43.8 |
| IFBench | 63.5% | – |
| AA-LCR | 82.3% | 88.7% |
| MMMU-Pro | – | 80.5% |
| AA-Omniscience | 43.3 | 19.7 |
| Terminal-Bench Hard | 62.9% | – |
| GPQA Diamond (AA) | 92.6% | 93.5% |
| Humanity's Last Exam (AA) | 55.5% | 46.9% |
| SciCode (AA) | 61.0% | 59.5% |
| τ²-Bench Telecom (AA) | 98.5% | – |
| LiveCodeBench | 89.8% | – |
| MMLU-Pro | 91.5% | – |
| IOI | 72.3% | – |
| LegalBench | 88.6% | 86.0% |
| CorpFin | 71.8% | 71.6% |
| TaxEval | 76.9% | 75.7% |
| Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals) | 80.5% | 80.9% |
| SWE-bench (Vals) | 95.0% | 93.4% |
| GPQA Diamond (Vals) | 93.2% | 92.9% |
| Vals Index | 66.0 | 57.8 |
| MCP Atlas | 83.3% | – |
| PRBench Finance | 53.9% | – |
| PRBench Legal | 52.6% | – |
| HiL-Bench | 56.3% | – |
| EQ-Bench 4 | 1340 | 1339 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 88.8% | – |
Data as of 2026-09-09. Best configuration of each model; every score links to its source on the model pages.