BenchLeader

Claude Opus 4.6 vs Kimi K3

Verdict
  • Kimi K3 leads on quality: 66.5 vs 63.1.
  • Claude Opus 4.6 is stronger in agents & tools, instruction following, knowledge, reasoning.
  • Kimi K3 is stronger in coding, composite, human preference, long context, maths, multimodal.
  • Kimi K3 is 1.7× cheaper ($6.00 vs $10.00 per 1M blended).
MetricClaude Opus 4.6Kimi K3
BenchLeader Index63.166.5
Agents & tools score68.867.5
Coding score62.364.9
Composite score69.274.1
Human preference score64.671.2
Instruction following score53.7
Knowledge score70.568.1
Long context score65.571.1
Maths score65.678.1
Multimodal score63.665.1
Reasoning score62.3
Blended price $/M$10.00$6.00
Output speed38 tok/s37 tok/s
Time to first answer2.0 s57.7 s
Context window1M1.0M
GPQA Diamond90.5%
OTIS Mock AIME94.4%
SWE-bench Verified (Epoch)78.7%
Humanity's Last Exam19.0%
Terminal-Bench79.8%
SimpleBench67.6%
SciCode58.7%
Cybench93.0%
Remote Labor Index4.2%
WeirdML77.9%
APEX-Agents32.4%39.3%
FrontierCode26.6%44.2%
ProofBench87.0%
GSO-Bench33.3%
Epoch Capabilities Index155.3157.6
LMArena Text1498
LMArena Hard Prompts1527
LMArena Coding1546
LMArena WebDev1537
LMArena Vision1311
LiveBench79.2%
LiveBench Reasoning90.7%
LiveBench Coding81.5%
LiveBench Agentic Coding62.2%
LiveBench Mathematics84.4%
LiveBench Data Analysis78.7%
LiveBench Language85.5%
AA Intelligence Index31.943.8
IFBench53.1%
AA-LCR78.0%88.7%
MMMU-Pro75.4%80.5%
AA-Omniscience13.719.7
Terminal-Bench Hard48.5%
GPQA Diamond (AA)89.6%93.5%
Humanity's Last Exam (AA)39.9%46.9%
SciCode (AA)59.5%
τ²-Bench Telecom (AA)92.1%
LegalBench86.0%
CorpFin71.6%
TaxEval75.7%
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals)80.9%
SWE-bench (Vals)93.4%
GPQA Diamond (Vals)92.9%
Vals Index57.8
HiL-Bench38.3%
EQ-Bench 412231339
Kagi LLM Benchmark72.4%
SWE-bench Verified (bash only)75.6%
SWE-bench Verified (any scaffold)75.6%

Data as of 2026-09-09. Best configuration of each model; every score links to its source on the model pages.