DeepSeek V4 Pro vs Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B
DeepSeek V4 Pro 
Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B Verdict
- Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B leads on quality: 65.2 vs 64.2.
- DeepSeek V4 Pro (max) is stronger in coding, instruction following, maths.
- Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B is stronger in agents & tools, composite, knowledge, reasoning.
- DeepSeek V4 Pro (max) is 5.5× cheaper ($0.544 vs $3.00 per 1M blended).
- DeepSeek V4 Pro (max) streams 2.1× faster (81 vs 38 tokens per second).
| Metric | DeepSeek V4 Pro (max) | Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B |
|---|---|---|
| BenchLeader Index | 64.2 | 65.2 |
| Agents & tools score | 70.2 | 78.3 |
| Coding score | 58.8 | – |
| Composite score | 75.0 | 79.8 |
| Instruction following score | 74.3 | – |
| Knowledge score | 58.1 | 66.3 |
| Long context score | 66.6 | 66.6 |
| Maths score | 53.7 | – |
| Reasoning score | 70.9 | 80.5 |
| Blended price $/M | $0.544 | $3.00 |
| Output speed | 81 tok/s | 38 tok/s |
| Time to first answer | 55.6 s | 55.2 s |
| Context window | 1M | 984k |
| GPQA Diamond | 89.7% | – |
| FrontierMath Tiers 1–3 | 45.3% | – |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 2.4% | – |
| OTIS Mock AIME | 96.7% | – |
| SWE-bench Verified (Epoch) | 77.6% | – |
| SimpleQA Verified | 47.0% | – |
| SciCode | 50.0% | – |
| WeirdML | 48.9% | – |
| ProofBench | 16.0% | – |
| AA Intelligence Index | 36.3 | 40.0 |
| IFBench | 76.5% | – |
| AA-LCR | 80.3% | 80.3% |
| AA-Omniscience | 0.8 | 4.3 |
| Terminal-Bench Hard | 46.2% | – |
| GPQA Diamond (AA) | 92.8% | 93.5% |
| Humanity's Last Exam (AA) | 41.0% | 42.5% |
| SciCode (AA) | 51.0% | 54.0% |
| τ²-Bench Telecom (AA) | 96.2% | – |
| LiveCodeBench | 87.5% | – |
| MMLU-Pro | 87.3% | – |
| LegalBench | 80.3% | – |
| CorpFin | 61.4% | – |
| TaxEval | 72.1% | – |
| SWE-bench (Vals) | 77.4% | – |
| GPQA Diamond (Vals) | 89.4% | – |
| Vals Index | 42.9 | – |
| AIME 2026 | 96.7% | – |
| HMMT February 2026 | 93.9% | – |
| MathArena Apex | 28.1% | – |
| CritPt | 18.0% | 20.0% |
| GDPval (AA) | 49.7% | 56.4% |
| τ²-Bench Banking (AA) | 39.6% | 49.1% |
| ITBench SRE (AA) | 38.3% | – |
| Analyst Agent (AA) | 18.8% | – |
| APEX-Agents (AA) | 24.3% | – |
| CaseLaw v2 | 59.4% | – |
| Code Migration | 26.2% | – |
| Excel Modeling Benchmark | 51.6% | – |
| Finance Agent v2 | 44.1% | – |
| Harvey's Legal Agent Benchmark | 3.8% | – |
| Legal Research Bench | 23.1% | – |
| MedCode | 40.5% | – |
| MedScribe | 75.1% | – |
| ProgramBench | 0.0% | – |
| Public Benefits Bench | 62.9% | – |
| SkillsBench | 51.3% | – |
| Vibe Code Bench v1.1 | 49.9% | – |
| Chess Puzzles | 20.0% | – |
| LMCA | 41.2% | – |
| DTBench | 90.7% | – |
Data as of 2026-09-19. Best configuration of each model; every score links to its source on the model pages.
DeepSeek V4 Pro vs Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B: questions
- Is DeepSeek V4 Pro better than Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B?
- Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B leads on quality: 65.2 vs 64.2. The BenchLeader Index combines every independent quality benchmark; Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B is ahead overall as of 2026-09-19, but check the category scores for your use.
- Is DeepSeek V4 Pro better than Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B for agentic tasks?
- Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B scores higher in agentic tasks (78 vs 70 on the category index, where 50 is average).
- Which is cheaper, DeepSeek V4 Pro or Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B?
- DeepSeek V4 Pro is cheaper: $0.544 against $3.00 per million tokens, blended at three input tokens per output token.
- Which is faster, DeepSeek V4 Pro or Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B?
- DeepSeek V4 Pro streams faster: 81 against 38 output tokens per second.
- Which has the larger context window?
- DeepSeek V4 Pro accepts more context: 1M against 984k tokens.