Gemini 3.5 Flash vs Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B
Gemini 3.5 Flash 
Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B Verdict
- Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B leads on quality: 65.2 vs 64.2.
- Gemini 3.5 Flash (medium) is stronger in coding, human preference, instruction following, knowledge, maths, multimodal.
- Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B is stronger in agents & tools, composite, long context, reasoning.
- They cost about the same ($3.00 per 1M blended).
- Gemini 3.5 Flash (medium) streams 5.3× faster (201 vs 38 tokens per second).
| Metric | Gemini 3.5 Flash (medium) | Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B |
|---|---|---|
| BenchLeader Index | 64.2 | 65.2 |
| Agents & tools score | 67.9 | 78.3 |
| Coding score | 58.7 | – |
| Composite score | 71.6 | 79.8 |
| Human preference score | 67.4 | – |
| Instruction following score | 72.7 | – |
| Knowledge score | 74.1 | 66.3 |
| Long context score | 63.5 | 66.6 |
| Maths score | 67.2 | – |
| Multimodal score | 67.5 | – |
| Reasoning score | 64.2 | 80.5 |
| Blended price $/M | $3.38 | $3.00 |
| Output speed | 201 tok/s | 38 tok/s |
| Time to first answer | 13.9 s | 55.2 s |
| Context window | 1.0M | 984k |
| LMArena Text | 1474 | – |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1493 | – |
| LMArena Coding | 1502 | – |
| LMArena WebDev | 1492 | – |
| LMArena Vision | 1307 | – |
| AA Intelligence Index | 33.6 | 40.0 |
| IFBench | 74.6% | – |
| AA-LCR | 74.3% | 80.3% |
| MMMU-Pro | 83.9% | – |
| AA-Omniscience | 20.8 | 4.3 |
| Terminal-Bench Hard | 39.4% | – |
| GPQA Diamond (AA) | 92.1% | 93.5% |
| Humanity's Last Exam (AA) | 41.3% | 42.5% |
| SciCode (AA) | – | 54.0% |
| τ²-Bench Telecom (AA) | 95.6% | – |
| CritPt | 10.9% | 20.0% |
| GDPval (AA) | – | 56.4% |
| τ²-Bench Banking (AA) | – | 49.1% |
| LMArena Maths | 1478 | – |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1466 | – |
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1463 | – |
| LMArena Multi-turn | 1476 | – |
| LMArena Longer Queries | 1478 | – |
| LMArena Document | 1461 | – |
| Surface Evolver Bench | 58.1% | – |
| DeepSWE | 37.4% | – |
| GDP.pdf | 14.0% | – |
Data as of 2026-09-19. Best configuration of each model; every score links to its source on the model pages.
Gemini 3.5 Flash vs Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B: questions
- Is Gemini 3.5 Flash better than Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B?
- Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B leads on quality: 65.2 vs 64.2. The BenchLeader Index combines every independent quality benchmark; Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B is ahead overall as of 2026-09-19, but check the category scores for your use.
- Is Gemini 3.5 Flash better than Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B for agentic tasks?
- Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B scores higher in agentic tasks (78 vs 68 on the category index, where 50 is average).
- Which is cheaper, Gemini 3.5 Flash or Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B?
- Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B is cheaper: $3.00 against $3.38 per million tokens, blended at three input tokens per output token.
- Which is faster, Gemini 3.5 Flash or Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B?
- Gemini 3.5 Flash streams faster: 201 against 38 output tokens per second.
- Which has the larger context window?
- Gemini 3.5 Flash accepts more context: 1.0M against 984k tokens.