Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B vs Step 5 Preview
Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B 
Step 5 Preview Verdict
- Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B and Step 5 Preview are level on quality (65.2 vs 65.0).
- Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B is stronger in agents & tools.
- Step 5 Preview is stronger in composite, knowledge, long context, reasoning, multimodal.
- Step 5 Preview is 2.1× cheaper ($1.43 vs $3.00 per 1M blended).
| Metric | Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B | Step 5 Preview |
|---|---|---|
| BenchLeader Index | 65.2 | 65.0 |
| Agents & tools score | 78.3 | – |
| Composite score | 79.8 | 84.4 |
| Knowledge score | 66.3 | 72.0 |
| Long context score | 66.6 | 70.8 |
| Reasoning score | 80.5 | 82.1 |
| Multimodal score | – | 60.8 |
| Blended price $/M | $3.00 | $1.43 |
| Output speed | 38 tok/s | – |
| Time to first answer | 55.2 s | – |
| Context window | 984k | 1M |
| AA Intelligence Index | 40.0 | 43.6 |
| AA-LCR | 80.3% | 88.3% |
| MMMU-Pro | – | 76.4% |
| AA-Omniscience | 4.3 | 16.4 |
| GPQA Diamond (AA) | 93.5% | – |
| Humanity's Last Exam (AA) | 42.5% | 46.5% |
| SciCode (AA) | 54.0% | 58.9% |
| CritPt | 20.0% | 20.9% |
| GDPval (AA) | 56.4% | 53.6% |
| τ²-Bench Banking (AA) | 49.1% | – |
Data as of 2026-09-19. Best configuration of each model; every score links to its source on the model pages.
Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B vs Step 5 Preview: questions
- Is Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B better than Step 5 Preview?
- Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B and Step 5 Preview are level on quality (65.2 vs 65.0). The BenchLeader Index combines every independent quality benchmark; Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B is ahead overall as of 2026-09-19, but check the category scores for your use.
- Which is cheaper, Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B or Step 5 Preview?
- Step 5 Preview is cheaper: $1.43 against $3.00 per million tokens, blended at three input tokens per output token.
- Which has the larger context window?
- Step 5 Preview accepts more context: 1M against 984k tokens.