Deepseek v4 Flash Vision vs Muse Spark 1.3
Deepseek v4 Flash Vision 
Muse Spark 1.3 Verdict
- Muse Spark 1.3 (max) leads on quality: 69.3 vs 59.8.
- Muse Spark 1.3 (max) is stronger in agents & tools, composite, knowledge, long context, multimodal, reasoning, coding, human preference, maths.
- Deepseek v4 Flash Vision (max) is 7.6× cheaper ($0.262 vs $2.00 per 1M blended).
| Metric | Deepseek v4 Flash Vision (max) | Muse Spark 1.3 (max) |
|---|---|---|
| BenchLeader Index | 59.8 | 69.3 |
| Agents & tools score | 69.9 | 71.1 |
| Composite score | 73.4 | 90.1 |
| Knowledge score | 55.8 | 76.1 |
| Long context score | 67.1 | 68.0 |
| Multimodal score | 59.2 | 67.4 |
| Reasoning score | 62.9 | 83.1 |
| Coding score | – | 66.6 |
| Human preference score | – | 69.8 |
| Maths score | – | 69.2 |
| Blended price $/M | $0.262 | $2.00 |
| Output speed | 215 tok/s | 223 tok/s |
| Time to first answer | 10.4 s | 34.8 s |
| Context window | 1M | 1.0M |
| LMArena Text | – | 1493 |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | – | 1516 |
| LMArena Coding | – | 1537 |
| LMArena WebDev | – | 1652 |
| LMArena Vision | – | 1315 |
| LMArena Agent | – | 4.2 |
| AA Intelligence Index | 35.0 | 48.2 |
| AA-LCR | 81.3% | 83.0% |
| MMMU-Pro | 74.8% | – |
| AA-Omniscience | -17.6 | 25 |
| GPQA Diamond (AA) | 91.3% | 93.5% |
| Humanity's Last Exam (AA) | 34.5% | 48.7% |
| SciCode (AA) | 49.6% | 58.8% |
| IOI | – | 56.6% |
| Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals) | – | 79.0% |
| Vals Index | – | 64.5 |
| CritPt | 10.9% | 24.9% |
| GDPval (AA) | 53.9% | 60.2% |
| τ²-Bench Banking (AA) | 41.0% | 50.5% |
| Code Migration | – | 47.4% |
| Excel Modeling Benchmark | – | 67.4% |
| Finance Agent v2 | – | 60.0% |
| Harvey's Legal Agent Benchmark | – | 23.8% |
| Legal Research Bench | – | 55.3% |
| MysteryMechanism | – | 36.0% |
| Terminal-Bench 4.0 (Vals) | – | 27.8% |
| Terminal-Bench Science | – | 14.3% |
| Vibe Code Bench 1-100 | – | 20.5% |
| Vibe Code Bench v1.1 | – | 85.9% |
| LMArena Maths | – | 1496 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | – | 1453 |
| LMArena Instruction Following | – | 1483 |
| LMArena Multi-turn | – | 1493 |
| LMArena Longer Queries | – | 1506 |
| LMArena Document | – | 1468 |
Data as of 2026-09-19. Best configuration of each model; every score links to its source on the model pages.
Deepseek v4 Flash Vision vs Muse Spark 1.3: questions
- Is Deepseek v4 Flash Vision better than Muse Spark 1.3?
- Muse Spark 1.3 (max) leads on quality: 69.3 vs 59.8. The BenchLeader Index combines every independent quality benchmark; Muse Spark 1.3 (max) is ahead overall as of 2026-09-19, but check the category scores for your use.
- Is Deepseek v4 Flash Vision better than Muse Spark 1.3 for agentic tasks?
- Muse Spark 1.3 scores higher in agentic tasks (71 vs 70 on the category index, where 50 is average).
- Which is cheaper, Deepseek v4 Flash Vision or Muse Spark 1.3?
- Deepseek v4 Flash Vision is cheaper: $0.262 against $2.00 per million tokens, blended at three input tokens per output token.
- Which is faster, Deepseek v4 Flash Vision or Muse Spark 1.3?
- Muse Spark 1.3 streams faster: 223 against 215 output tokens per second.
- Which has the larger context window?
- Muse Spark 1.3 accepts more context: 1.0M against 1M tokens.