DeepSeek V4 Pro vs Muse Spark 1.1
DeepSeek V4 Pro 
Muse Spark 1.1 Verdict
- Muse Spark 1.1 leads on quality: 65.0 vs 59.5.
- DeepSeek V4 Pro (high) is stronger in agents & tools.
- Muse Spark 1.1 is stronger in composite, instruction following, knowledge, long context, coding, human preference, maths, multimodal, reasoning.
- DeepSeek V4 Pro (high) is 3.6× cheaper ($0.548 vs $2.00 per 1M blended).
- Muse Spark 1.1 streams 3.0× faster (194 vs 65 tokens per second).
| Metric | DeepSeek V4 Pro (high) | Muse Spark 1.1 |
|---|---|---|
| BenchLeader Index | 59.5 | 65.0 |
| Agents & tools score | 63.8 | 62.7 |
| Composite score | 67.1 | 72.3 |
| Instruction following score | 69.6 | 77.8 |
| Knowledge score | 59.1 | 73.2 |
| Long context score | 61.6 | 65.4 |
| Coding score | – | 68.1 |
| Human preference score | – | 66.3 |
| Maths score | – | 52.2 |
| Multimodal score | – | 65.0 |
| Reasoning score | – | 69.2 |
| Blended price $/M | $0.548 | $2.00 |
| Output speed | 65 tok/s | 194 tok/s |
| Time to first answer | 32.3 s | 2.6 s |
| Context window | 1M | 1.0M |
| SimpleQA Verified | – | 57.8% |
| SciCode | – | 58.2% |
| APEX-Agents | – | 41.9% |
| ProofBench | – | 39.0% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | – | 154.6 |
| LMArena Text | – | 1492 |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | – | 1511 |
| LMArena Coding | – | 1531 |
| LMArena WebDev | – | 1541 |
| LMArena Vision | – | 1293 |
| LMArena Agent | 4.4 | -2.6 |
| AA Intelligence Index | 30.1 | 34.3 |
| IFBench | 71.3% | – |
| AA-LCR | 70.3% | 77.7% |
| AA-Omniscience | -10.6 | 28.1 |
| Terminal-Bench Hard | 41.7% | – |
| GPQA Diamond (AA) | 90.5% | 89.8% |
| Humanity's Last Exam (AA) | 35.2% | 46.2% |
| SciCode (AA) | – | 58.8% |
| τ²-Bench Telecom (AA) | 94.2% | – |
| SWE-Bench Pro | – | 61.5% |
| MCP Atlas | – | 88.1% |
| MultiChallenge | – | 75.3% |
| PRBench Finance | – | 55.0% |
| PRBench Legal | – | 57.0% |
| MultiNRC | – | 65.6% |
| EQ-Bench 4 | – | 1260 |
Data as of 2026-09-10. Best configuration of each model; every score links to its source on the model pages.
DeepSeek V4 Pro vs Muse Spark 1.1: questions
- Is DeepSeek V4 Pro better than Muse Spark 1.1?
- Muse Spark 1.1 leads on quality: 65.0 vs 59.5. The BenchLeader Index combines every independent quality benchmark; Muse Spark 1.1 is ahead overall as of 2026-09-10, but check the category scores for your use.
- Is DeepSeek V4 Pro better than Muse Spark 1.1 for agentic tasks?
- DeepSeek V4 Pro scores higher in agentic tasks (64 vs 63 on the category index, where 50 is average).
- Which is cheaper, DeepSeek V4 Pro or Muse Spark 1.1?
- DeepSeek V4 Pro is cheaper: $0.548 against $2.00 per million tokens, blended at three input tokens per output token.
- Which is faster, DeepSeek V4 Pro or Muse Spark 1.1?
- Muse Spark 1.1 streams faster: 194 against 65 output tokens per second.
- Which has the larger context window?
- Muse Spark 1.1 accepts more context: 1.0M against 1M tokens.