BenchLeader

Gemini 3.7 Flash vs Step 5 Preview

Verdict
  • Gemini 3.7 Flash (medium) and Step 5 Preview are level on quality (64.7 vs 65.0).
  • Gemini 3.7 Flash (medium) is stronger in agents & tools, coding, knowledge, multimodal.
  • Step 5 Preview is stronger in composite, long context, reasoning.
  • They cost about the same ($1.43 per 1M blended).
MetricGemini 3.7 Flash (medium)Step 5 Preview
BenchLeader Index64.765.0
Agents & tools score64.1
Coding score68.5
Composite score79.284.4
Knowledge score75.572.0
Long context score68.070.8
Multimodal score69.460.8
Reasoning score62.182.1
Blended price $/M$1.50$1.43
Output speed276 tok/s
Time to first answer5.4 s
Context window1.0M1M
SciCode57.9%
AA Intelligence Index39.643.6
AA-LCR83.0%88.3%
MMMU-Pro84.7%76.4%
AA-Omniscience23.716.4
GPQA Diamond (AA)92.1%
Humanity's Last Exam (AA)39.0%46.5%
SciCode (AA)59.8%58.9%
ARC-AGI-191.2%
ARC-AGI-263.8%
CritPt9.4%20.9%
GDPval (AA)45.3%53.6%
τ²-Bench Banking (AA)35.5%
DeepSWE65.5%
CursorBench59.0%
GDP.pdf21.8%

Data as of 2026-09-19. Best configuration of each model; every score links to its source on the model pages.

Gemini 3.7 Flash vs Step 5 Preview: questions

Is Gemini 3.7 Flash better than Step 5 Preview?
Gemini 3.7 Flash (medium) and Step 5 Preview are level on quality (64.7 vs 65.0). The BenchLeader Index combines every independent quality benchmark; Step 5 Preview is ahead overall as of 2026-09-19, but check the category scores for your use.
Which is cheaper, Gemini 3.7 Flash or Step 5 Preview?
Step 5 Preview is cheaper: $1.43 against $1.50 per million tokens, blended at three input tokens per output token.
Which has the larger context window?
Gemini 3.7 Flash accepts more context: 1.0M against 1M tokens.