Gemini 3.7 Flash vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro
Gemini 3.7 Flash 
MiMo-V2.6-Pro Verdict
- Gemini 3.7 Flash (medium) and MiMo-V2.6-Pro are level on quality (64.1 vs 64.3).
- Gemini 3.7 Flash (medium) is stronger in agents & tools, coding, knowledge, multimodal.
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro is stronger in composite, long context, reasoning.
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro is 2.7× cheaper ($0.548 vs $1.50 per 1M blended).
- Gemini 3.7 Flash (medium) streams 5.2× faster (281 vs 54 tokens per second).
| Metric | Gemini 3.7 Flash (medium) | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| BenchLeader Index | 64.1 | 64.3 |
| Agents & tools score | 64.1 | 55.1 |
| Coding score | 70.0 | – |
| Composite score | 76.7 | 84.8 |
| Knowledge score | 73.8 | 66.8 |
| Long context score | 67.3 | 69.1 |
| Multimodal score | 68.6 | – |
| Reasoning score | 61.0 | 88.8 |
| Blended price $/M | $1.50 | $0.548 |
| Output speed | 281 tok/s | 54 tok/s |
| Time to first answer | 5.1 s | 39.8 s |
| Context window | 1.0M | 1.0M |
| SciCode | 59.8% | – |
| AA Intelligence Index | 39.6 | 46.3 |
| AA-LCR | 83.0% | 86.3% |
| MMMU-Pro | 84.7% | – |
| AA-Omniscience | 23.7 | 8.4 |
| GPQA Diamond (AA) | 92.1% | – |
| Humanity's Last Exam (AA) | 39.0% | 49.4% |
| SciCode (AA) | 59.8% | 60.9% |
| Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals) | – | 67.8% |
| Vals Index | – | 59.7 |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 91.2% | – |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 63.8% | – |
| CritPt | 9.4% | 26.6% |
| GDPval (AA) | 42.0% | 58.7% |
| τ²-Bench Banking (AA) | 35.5% | – |
| Code Migration | – | 43.0% |
| Excel Modeling Benchmark | – | 62.9% |
| Finance Agent v2 | – | 58.3% |
| Harvey's Legal Agent Benchmark | – | 10.8% |
| Legal Research Bench | – | 47.1% |
| Terminal-Bench Science | – | 2.9% |
| Vibe Code Bench v1.1 | – | 85.2% |
| DeepSWE | 65.5% | – |
| LMCA | 49.2% | – |
| DTBench | 94.7% | – |
| GDP.pdf | 21.8% | – |
| Terminal-Bench 4.0 (AA) | – | 34.9% |
| Terminal-Bench 2.1 (AA) | 78.3% | – |
| AutomationBench | – | 58.6% |
| GDP.pdf | – | 19.2% |
| EnterpriseOps-Gym | 50.4% | – |
| AA-Omniscience: accuracy | 54.0% | 34.9% |
| AA-Omniscience: non-hallucination | 34.1% | 59.4% |
| AA-Briefcase | – | 1522 |
Data as of 2026-09-23. Best configuration of each model; every score links to its source on the model pages.
Gemini 3.7 Flash vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro: questions
- Is Gemini 3.7 Flash better than MiMo-V2.6-Pro?
- Gemini 3.7 Flash (medium) and MiMo-V2.6-Pro are level on quality (64.1 vs 64.3). The BenchLeader Index combines every independent quality benchmark; MiMo-V2.6-Pro is ahead overall as of 2026-09-23, but check the category scores for your use.
- Is Gemini 3.7 Flash better than MiMo-V2.6-Pro for agentic tasks?
- Gemini 3.7 Flash scores higher in agentic tasks (64 vs 55 on the category index, where 50 is average).
- Which is cheaper, Gemini 3.7 Flash or MiMo-V2.6-Pro?
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro is cheaper: $0.548 against $1.50 per million tokens, blended at three input tokens per output token.
- Which is faster, Gemini 3.7 Flash or MiMo-V2.6-Pro?
- Gemini 3.7 Flash streams faster: 281 against 54 output tokens per second.
- Which has the larger context window?
- Both accept 1.0M tokens of context.