Claude Fable 5 vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro
Claude Fable 5 
MiMo-V2.6-Pro Verdict
- Claude Fable 5 (thinking) leads on quality: 70.0 vs 64.3.
- Claude Fable 5 (thinking) is stronger in agents & tools, composite, instruction following, knowledge, reasoning.
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro is stronger in long context.
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro is 36× cheaper ($0.548 vs $20.00 per 1M blended).
| Metric | Claude Fable 5 (thinking) | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| BenchLeader Index | 70.0 | 64.3 |
| Agents & tools score | 74.1 | 55.1 |
| Composite score | 88.8 | 84.8 |
| Instruction following score | 63.0 | – |
| Knowledge score | 82.9 | 66.8 |
| Long context score | 67.0 | 69.1 |
| Reasoning score | 89.0 | 88.8 |
| Blended price $/M | $20.00 | $0.548 |
| Output speed | 67 tok/s | 54 tok/s |
| Time to first answer | 108.0 s | 39.8 s |
| Context window | 1M | 1.0M |
| AA Intelligence Index | 49.6 | 46.3 |
| IFBench | 63.5% | – |
| AA-LCR | 82.3% | 86.3% |
| AA-Omniscience | 43.3 | 8.4 |
| Terminal-Bench Hard | 62.9% | – |
| GPQA Diamond (AA) | 92.6% | – |
| Humanity's Last Exam (AA) | 55.5% | 49.4% |
| SciCode (AA) | 61.0% | 60.9% |
| τ²-Bench Telecom (AA) | 98.5% | – |
| Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals) | – | 67.8% |
| Vals Index | – | 59.7 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 91.4% | – |
| CritPt | 28.6% | 26.6% |
| GDPval (AA) | 54.8% | 58.7% |
| τ²-Bench Banking (AA) | 38.1% | – |
| Analyst Agent (AA) | 48.8% | – |
| Code Migration | – | 43.0% |
| Excel Modeling Benchmark | – | 62.9% |
| Finance Agent v2 | – | 58.3% |
| Harvey's Legal Agent Benchmark | – | 10.8% |
| Legal Research Bench | – | 47.1% |
| Terminal-Bench Science | – | 2.9% |
| Vibe Code Bench v1.1 | – | 85.2% |
| Terminal-Bench 4.0 (AA) | 42.4% | 34.9% |
| Terminal-Bench 2.1 (AA) | 84.6% | – |
| AutomationBench | 54.1% | 58.6% |
| GDP.pdf | 24.0% | 19.2% |
| MLCR | 64.4% | – |
| Harvey LAB | 93.6% | – |
| EnterpriseOps-Gym | 51.1% | – |
| AA-Omniscience: accuracy | 65.3% | 34.9% |
| AA-Omniscience: non-hallucination | 36.4% | 59.4% |
| AA-Briefcase | 1543 | 1522 |
Data as of 2026-09-23. Best configuration of each model; every score links to its source on the model pages.
Claude Fable 5 vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro: questions
- Is Claude Fable 5 better than MiMo-V2.6-Pro?
- Claude Fable 5 (thinking) leads on quality: 70.0 vs 64.3. The BenchLeader Index combines every independent quality benchmark; Claude Fable 5 (thinking) is ahead overall as of 2026-09-23, but check the category scores for your use.
- Is Claude Fable 5 better than MiMo-V2.6-Pro for agentic tasks?
- Claude Fable 5 scores higher in agentic tasks (74 vs 55 on the category index, where 50 is average).
- Which is cheaper, Claude Fable 5 or MiMo-V2.6-Pro?
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro is cheaper: $0.548 against $20.00 per million tokens, blended at three input tokens per output token.
- Which is faster, Claude Fable 5 or MiMo-V2.6-Pro?
- Claude Fable 5 streams faster: 67 against 54 output tokens per second.
- Which has the larger context window?
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro accepts more context: 1.0M against 1M tokens.