Gemini 4 Argon vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro
Gemini 4 Argon 
MiMo-V2.6-Pro Verdict
- Gemini 4 Argon (high) leads on quality: 70.0 vs 64.8.
- Gemini 4 Argon (high) is stronger in agents & tools, coding, composite, human preference, knowledge, maths, reasoning.
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro is stronger in long context, multimodal.
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro is 7.3× cheaper ($0.548 vs $4.00 per 1M blended).
| Metric | Gemini 4 Argon (high) | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| BenchLeader Index | 70.0 | 64.8 |
| Agents & tools score | 67.5 | 56.5 |
| Coding score | 72.1 | 62.0 |
| Composite score | 89.2 | 82.1 |
| Human preference score | 73.2 | 67.7 |
| Knowledge score | 75.7 | 65.5 |
| Long context score | 65.0 | 68.5 |
| Maths score | 71.9 | 66.1 |
| Reasoning score | 82.0 | 79.6 |
| Multimodal score | – | 60.1 |
| Blended price $/M | $4.00 | $0.548 |
| Output speed | – | 43 tok/s |
| Time to first answer | – | 51.1 s |
| Context window | 1M | 1.0M |
| SciCode | 61.8% | 60.9% |
| APEX-Agents | – | 59.5% |
| ProofBench | – | 70.0% |
| LMArena Text | 1525 | 1480 |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1551 | 1506 |
| LMArena Coding | 1562 | 1539 |
| LMArena WebDev | 1678 | 1629 |
| LMArena Vision | – | 1264 |
| LMArena Agent | 9.3 | 3.5 |
| AA Intelligence Index v4.3.2 | 52.6 | 46.3 |
| AA-LCR | 79.7% | 86.3% |
| AA-Omniscience | 42.4 | 8.4 |
| Humanity's Last Exam (AA) | 57.1% | 49.4% |
| SciCode (AA) | 61.8% | 60.9% |
| IOI | 100.0% | 39.3% |
| LegalBench | 88.3% | – |
| Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals) | – | 67.8% |
| Vals Index | 68.9 | 55.2 |
| CritPt | 27.1% | 26.6% |
| GDPval-AA v2.1 | 56.3% | 59.2% |
| BioMysteryBench | 76.3% | – |
| Code Migration | 68.2% | 43.0% |
| CUA-bench | 4.8% | – |
| CyberBench | 77.9% | 72.9% |
| Excel Modeling Benchmark | 75.2% | 62.9% |
| Finance Agent v2 | 65.4% | 57.3% |
| Harvey's Legal Agent Benchmark | 19.6% | 10.8% |
| Legal Research Bench | 54.8% | 47.1% |
| MedCode | 58.8% | 45.0% |
| MedScribe | 87.4% | 88.3% |
| MysteryMechanism | 45.5% | 15.3% |
| ProgramBench | 2.5% | 0.5% |
| Public Benefits Bench | 69.8% | 68.9% |
| SAGE | 53.6% | 45.0% |
| SREBench | 44.3% | 3.0% |
| Tax Agent Bench | 76.2% | 64.9% |
| Terminal-Bench 4.0 (Vals) | 57.6% | 31.3% |
| Terminal-Bench Science | 44.3% | 2.9% |
| Vibe Code Bench v1.1 | 91.9% | 85.2% |
| LMArena Maths | 1528 | 1483 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1519 | 1448 |
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1529 | 1474 |
| LMArena Multi-turn | 1553 | 1456 |
| LMArena Longer Queries | 1545 | 1495 |
| ALE-Bench | – | 1158.1 |
| FrontierSWE | 55.0% | – |
| Terminal-Bench 4.0 (AA) | 57.1% | 34.9% |
| AutomationBench | 77.5% | 58.6% |
| GDP.pdf | 21.8% | 19.2% |
| MLCR | – | 18.3% |
| AA-Omniscience: accuracy | 49.9% | 34.9% |
| AA-Omniscience: non-hallucination | 84.9% | 59.4% |
| AA-Briefcase v1.1 | 1488 | 1516 |
| AA Openness Index | – | 52.8 |
Data as of 2026-10-11. Best configuration of each model; every score links to its source on the model pages.
Gemini 4 Argon vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro: questions
- Is Gemini 4 Argon better than MiMo-V2.6-Pro?
- Gemini 4 Argon (high) leads on quality: 70.0 vs 64.8. The BenchLeader Index combines every independent quality benchmark; Gemini 4 Argon (high) is ahead overall as of 2026-10-11, but check the category scores for your use.
- Is Gemini 4 Argon better than MiMo-V2.6-Pro for coding?
- Gemini 4 Argon scores higher in coding (72 vs 62 on the category index, where 50 is average).
- Is Gemini 4 Argon better than MiMo-V2.6-Pro for agentic tasks?
- Gemini 4 Argon scores higher in agentic tasks (68 vs 57 on the category index, where 50 is average).
- Which is cheaper, Gemini 4 Argon or MiMo-V2.6-Pro?
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro is cheaper: $0.548 against $4.00 per million tokens, blended at three input tokens per output token.
- Which has the larger context window?
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro accepts more context: 1.0M against 1M tokens.