Grok 4.7 vs Qwen3 6
Grok 4.7 
Qwen3 6 Verdict
- Grok 4.7 (high) leads on quality: 65.8 vs 63.3.
- Grok 4.7 (high) is stronger in composite, knowledge, reasoning.
- Qwen3 6 (max) is stronger in long context, agents & tools, coding, human preference, instruction following, maths.
- They cost about the same ($2.96 per 1M blended).
| Metric | Grok 4.7 (high) | Qwen3 6 (max) |
|---|---|---|
| BenchLeader Index | 65.8 | 63.3 |
| Composite score | 87.5 | 64.8 |
| Knowledge score | 72.6 | 63.9 |
| Long context score | 64.8 | 66.7 |
| Reasoning score | 76.4 | 59.1 |
| Agents & tools score | – | 71.9 |
| Coding score | – | 58.1 |
| Human preference score | – | 65.7 |
| Instruction following score | – | 74.4 |
| Maths score | – | 65.9 |
| Blended price $/M | $3.00 | $2.96 |
| Output speed | 55 tok/s | 69 tok/s |
| Time to first answer | 1.4 s | 32.1 s |
| Context window | 500k | 246k |
| GPQA Diamond | – | 87.4% |
| OTIS Mock AIME | – | 91.1% |
| SWE-bench Verified (Epoch) | – | 76.7% |
| SimpleQA Verified | – | 52.0% |
| SimpleBench | – | 63.0% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | – | 149.3 |
| LMArena Text | – | 1460 |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | – | 1482 |
| LMArena Coding | – | 1509 |
| LMArena WebDev | – | 1479 |
| AA Intelligence Index | 46.3 | 28.4 |
| IFBench | – | 76.6% |
| AA-LCR | 77.0% | 80.7% |
| AA-Omniscience | 30.9 | 9.2 |
| Terminal-Bench Hard | – | 43.9% |
| GPQA Diamond (AA) | – | 88.8% |
| Humanity's Last Exam (AA) | 42.3% | 30.8% |
| SciCode (AA) | 57.8% | – |
| τ²-Bench Telecom (AA) | – | 95.9% |
| LegalBench | 85.1% | – |
| CorpFin | – | 66.5% |
| SWE-bench (Vals) | – | 72.8% |
| CritPt | 18.0% | 3.7% |
| GDPval (AA) | 59.7% | – |
| CaseLaw v2 | – | 47.9% |
| Code Migration | 34.7% | – |
| Excel Modeling Benchmark | 54.9% | – |
| Harvey's Legal Agent Benchmark | 19.6% | – |
| Legal Research Bench | 39.9% | – |
| MedCode | 48.7% | – |
| MedScribe | 87.2% | – |
| ProgramBench | 0.0% | – |
| Public Benefits Bench | 68.5% | – |
| SAGE | 31.0% | – |
| Terminal-Bench 2.0 (Vals) | – | 51.7% |
| LMArena Maths | – | 1475 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | – | 1438 |
| LMArena Instruction Following | – | 1449 |
| LMArena Multi-turn | – | 1469 |
| LMArena Longer Queries | – | 1474 |
| Chess Puzzles | – | 20.0% |
| LMCA | – | 42.5% |
| DTBench | – | 87.2% |
| Vending-Bench 2 | – | 4254.2 |
Data as of 2026-09-21. Best configuration of each model; every score links to its source on the model pages.
Grok 4.7 vs Qwen3 6: questions
- Is Grok 4.7 better than Qwen3 6?
- Grok 4.7 (high) leads on quality: 65.8 vs 63.3. The BenchLeader Index combines every independent quality benchmark; Grok 4.7 (high) is ahead overall as of 2026-09-21, but check the category scores for your use.
- Which is cheaper, Grok 4.7 or Qwen3 6?
- Qwen3 6 is cheaper: $2.96 against $3.00 per million tokens, blended at three input tokens per output token.
- Which is faster, Grok 4.7 or Qwen3 6?
- Qwen3 6 streams faster: 69 against 55 output tokens per second.
- Which has the larger context window?
- Grok 4.7 accepts more context: 500k against 246k tokens.