BenchLeader

Claude Fable 5.1 vs Grok 4.7

Verdict
  • Claude Fable 5.1 (high) leads on quality: 71.9 vs 65.8.
  • Claude Fable 5.1 (high) is stronger in agents & tools, coding, composite, knowledge, long context, reasoning.
  • Grok 4.7 (high) is 6.7× cheaper ($3.00 vs $20.00 per 1M blended).
MetricClaude Fable 5.1 (high)Grok 4.7 (high)
BenchLeader Index71.965.8
Agents & tools score66.6
Coding score74.1
Composite score93.687.5
Knowledge score83.472.6
Long context score68.364.8
Reasoning score81.076.4
Blended price $/M$20.00$3.00
Output speed57 tok/s55 tok/s
Time to first answer26.2 s1.4 s
Context window1M500k
Terminal-Bench54.5%
SciCode57.6%
WeirdML92.3%
APEX-Agents44.4%
AA Intelligence Index51.146.3
AA-LCR83.7%77.0%
AA-Omniscience40.830.9
GPQA Diamond (AA)90.6%
Humanity's Last Exam (AA)55.9%42.3%
SciCode (AA)58.7%57.8%
LegalBench85.1%
ARC-AGI-196.0%
ARC-AGI-288.8%
CritPt30.3%18.0%
GDPval (AA)55.9%59.7%
τ²-Bench Banking (AA)43.1%
Code Migration34.7%
Excel Modeling Benchmark54.9%
Harvey's Legal Agent Benchmark19.6%
Legal Research Bench39.9%
MedCode48.7%
MedScribe87.2%
ProgramBench0.0%
Public Benefits Bench68.5%
SAGE31.0%
MirrorCode73.3%
CursorBench69.4%
ALE-Bench2143.2

Data as of 2026-09-21. Best configuration of each model; every score links to its source on the model pages.

Claude Fable 5.1 vs Grok 4.7: questions

Is Claude Fable 5.1 better than Grok 4.7?
Claude Fable 5.1 (high) leads on quality: 71.9 vs 65.8. The BenchLeader Index combines every independent quality benchmark; Claude Fable 5.1 (high) is ahead overall as of 2026-09-21, but check the category scores for your use.
Which is cheaper, Claude Fable 5.1 or Grok 4.7?
Grok 4.7 is cheaper: $3.00 against $20.00 per million tokens, blended at three input tokens per output token.
Which is faster, Claude Fable 5.1 or Grok 4.7?
Claude Fable 5.1 streams faster: 57 against 55 output tokens per second.
Which has the larger context window?
Claude Fable 5.1 accepts more context: 1M against 500k tokens.