Grok 4.7 vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
Grok 4.7 
Qwen3.8-Flash-Next Verdict
- Grok 4.7 (high) leads on quality: 65.8 vs 61.5.
- Grok 4.7 (high) is stronger in composite, knowledge, reasoning.
- Qwen3.8-Flash-Next is stronger in long context, agents & tools, coding, multimodal.
- Qwen3.8-Flash-Next is 13× cheaper ($0.230 vs $3.00 per 1M blended).
| Metric | Grok 4.7 (high) | Qwen3.8-Flash-Next |
|---|---|---|
| BenchLeader Index | 65.8 | 61.5 |
| Composite score | 87.5 | 67.2 |
| Knowledge score | 72.6 | 59.4 |
| Long context score | 64.8 | 66.2 |
| Reasoning score | 76.4 | 63.3 |
| Agents & tools score | – | 65.8 |
| Coding score | – | 71.2 |
| Multimodal score | – | 64.3 |
| Blended price $/M | $3.00 | $0.230 |
| Output speed | 55 tok/s | 61 tok/s |
| Time to first answer | 1.4 s | 35.5 s |
| Context window | 500k | 256k |
| LMArena WebDev | – | 1635 |
| LMArena Agent | – | -0.1 |
| LiveBench | – | 76.2% |
| LiveBench Reasoning | – | 87.4% |
| LiveBench Coding | – | 72.5% |
| LiveBench Agentic Coding | – | 61.6% |
| LiveBench Mathematics | – | 85.8% |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | – | 74.2% |
| LiveBench Language | – | 74.6% |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | – | 77.1% |
| AA Intelligence Index | 46.3 | 39.8 |
| AA-LCR | 77.0% | 79.7% |
| MMMU-Pro | – | 79.8% |
| AA-Omniscience | 30.9 | -9.7 |
| GPQA Diamond (AA) | – | 92.3% |
| Humanity's Last Exam (AA) | 42.3% | 38.0% |
| SciCode (AA) | 57.8% | 50.6% |
| LegalBench | 85.1% | – |
| CritPt | 18.0% | 11.1% |
| GDPval (AA) | 59.7% | 55.6% |
| τ²-Bench Banking (AA) | – | 45.4% |
| Code Migration | 34.7% | – |
| Excel Modeling Benchmark | 54.9% | – |
| Harvey's Legal Agent Benchmark | 19.6% | – |
| Legal Research Bench | 39.9% | – |
| MedCode | 48.7% | – |
| MedScribe | 87.2% | – |
| ProgramBench | 0.0% | – |
| Public Benefits Bench | 68.5% | – |
| SAGE | 31.0% | – |
Data as of 2026-09-21. Best configuration of each model; every score links to its source on the model pages.
Grok 4.7 vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next: questions
- Is Grok 4.7 better than Qwen3.8-Flash-Next?
- Grok 4.7 (high) leads on quality: 65.8 vs 61.5. The BenchLeader Index combines every independent quality benchmark; Grok 4.7 (high) is ahead overall as of 2026-09-21, but check the category scores for your use.
- Which is cheaper, Grok 4.7 or Qwen3.8-Flash-Next?
- Qwen3.8-Flash-Next is cheaper: $0.230 against $3.00 per million tokens, blended at three input tokens per output token.
- Which is faster, Grok 4.7 or Qwen3.8-Flash-Next?
- Qwen3.8-Flash-Next streams faster: 61 against 55 output tokens per second.
- Which has the larger context window?
- Grok 4.7 accepts more context: 500k against 256k tokens.