Gemini 3.5 Flash vs Qwen3.8 Max
Gemini 3.5 Flash 
Qwen3.8 Max Verdict
- Qwen3.8 Max (max) leads on quality: 64.2 vs 63.0.
- Gemini 3.5 Flash (medium) is stronger in agents & tools, instruction following, knowledge, maths, multimodal.
- Qwen3.8 Max (max) is stronger in coding, composite, human preference, long context, reasoning.
- They cost about the same ($3.00 per 1M blended).
- Gemini 3.5 Flash (medium) streams 5.6× faster (206 vs 37 tokens per second).
| Metric | Gemini 3.5 Flash (medium) | Qwen3.8 Max (max) |
|---|---|---|
| BenchLeader Index | 63.0 | 64.2 |
| Agents & tools score | 67.9 | 58.2 |
| Coding score | 56.8 | 64.6 |
| Composite score | 67.6 | 70.7 |
| Human preference score | 67.1 | 68.0 |
| Instruction following score | 72.7 | – |
| Knowledge score | 71.1 | 62.7 |
| Long context score | 62.3 | 65.4 |
| Maths score | 66.8 | 65.1 |
| Multimodal score | 66.5 | 66.2 |
| Reasoning score | 61.7 | 72.2 |
| Blended price $/M | $3.38 | $3.00 |
| Output speed | 206 tok/s | 37 tok/s |
| Time to first answer | 13.6 s | 58.9 s |
| Context window | 1.0M | 1M |
| Terminal-Bench | – | 27.0% |
| SciCode | – | 53.2% |
| APEX-Agents | – | 63.3% |
| ProofBench | – | 58.0% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | – | 156.4 |
| LMArena Text | 1476 | 1483 |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1495 | 1504 |
| LMArena Coding | 1506 | 1524 |
| LMArena WebDev | 1491 | 1672 |
| LMArena Vision | 1309 | 1314 |
| LMArena Agent | – | 2.3 |
| LiveBench | – | 78.5% |
| LiveBench Reasoning | – | 88.2% |
| LiveBench Coding | – | 72.9% |
| LiveBench Agentic Coding | – | 64.7% |
| LiveBench Mathematics | – | 91.3% |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | – | 78.4% |
| LiveBench Language | – | 79.7% |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | – | 74.1% |
| AA Intelligence Index v4.3.2 | 33.6 | 45.4 |
| IFBench | 74.6% | – |
| AA-LCR | 74.3% | 80.3% |
| MMMU-Pro | 83.9% | 82.8% |
| AA-Omniscience | 20.8 | 12.0 |
| Terminal-Bench Hard | 39.4% | – |
| GPQA Diamond (AA) | 92.1% | 92.8% |
| Humanity's Last Exam (AA) | 41.3% | 43.1% |
| SciCode (AA) | – | 53.2% |
| τ²-Bench Telecom (AA) | 95.6% | – |
| LiveCodeBench | – | 87.8% |
| MMLU-Pro | – | 88.6% |
| IOI | – | 68.9% |
| LegalBench | – | 83.6% |
| CorpFin | – | 65.8% |
| TaxEval | – | 75.5% |
| Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals) | – | 67.4% |
| SWE-bench (Vals) | – | 85.6% |
| GPQA Diamond (Vals) | – | 93.7% |
| Vals Index | – | 48.3 |
| CritPt | 10.9% | 20.0% |
| GDPval-AA v2.1 | – | 58.6% |
| τ³-Banking (AA) | – | 51.3% |
| ITBench SRE (AA) | – | 40.3% |
| Analyst Agent (AA) | – | 45.0% |
| APEX-Agents (AA) | – | 42.4% |
| Code Migration | – | 24.0% |
| CyberBench | – | 28.6% |
| Excel Modeling Benchmark | – | 60.1% |
| Finance Agent v2 | – | 50.6% |
| Harvey's Legal Agent Benchmark | – | 10.4% |
| Legal Research Bench | – | 47.6% |
| MedCode | – | 40.7% |
| MedScribe | – | 85.0% |
| MMMU-Pro (Vals) | – | 88.0% |
| MortgageTax | – | 64.0% |
| MysteryMechanism | – | 23.9% |
| ProgramBench | – | 0.0% |
| Public Benefits Bench | – | 67.1% |
| SAGE | – | 51.3% |
| SkillsBench | – | 42.0% |
| Tax Agent Bench | – | 66.0% |
| Terminal-Bench 4.0 (Vals) | – | 34.3% |
| Terminal-Bench Science | – | 1.4% |
| Vals Multimodal Index | – | 65.4% |
| Vibe Code Bench 1-100 | – | 12.8% |
| Vibe Code Bench v1.1 | – | 64.7% |
| LMArena Maths | 1482 | 1497 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1469 | 1470 |
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1466 | 1474 |
| LMArena Multi-turn | 1478 | 1492 |
| LMArena Longer Queries | 1480 | 1492 |
| LMArena Document | 1461 | – |
| Surface Evolver Bench | 58.1% | – |
| DeepSWE v1.1 | 37.4% | – |
| GDP.pdf | 14.0% | – |
| Terminal-Bench 4.0 (AA) | – | 38.9% |
| Terminal-Bench 2.1 (AA) | – | 88.8% |
| AutomationBench | – | 56.2% |
| GDP.pdf | – | 22.8% |
| MLCR | – | 20.0% |
| EnterpriseOps-Gym | – | 47.6% |
| AA-Omniscience: accuracy | 51.0% | 31.9% |
| AA-Omniscience: non-hallucination | 38.2% | 71.2% |
| AA-Briefcase v1.1 | – | 1617 |
Data as of 2026-10-11. Best configuration of each model; every score links to its source on the model pages.
Gemini 3.5 Flash vs Qwen3.8 Max: questions
- Is Gemini 3.5 Flash better than Qwen3.8 Max?
- Qwen3.8 Max (max) leads on quality: 64.2 vs 63.0. The BenchLeader Index combines every independent quality benchmark; Qwen3.8 Max (max) is ahead overall as of 2026-10-11, but check the category scores for your use.
- Is Gemini 3.5 Flash better than Qwen3.8 Max for coding?
- Qwen3.8 Max scores higher in coding (65 vs 57 on the category index, where 50 is average).
- Is Gemini 3.5 Flash better than Qwen3.8 Max for agentic tasks?
- Gemini 3.5 Flash scores higher in agentic tasks (68 vs 58 on the category index, where 50 is average).
- Which is cheaper, Gemini 3.5 Flash or Qwen3.8 Max?
- Qwen3.8 Max is cheaper: $3.00 against $3.38 per million tokens, blended at three input tokens per output token.
- Which is faster, Gemini 3.5 Flash or Qwen3.8 Max?
- Gemini 3.5 Flash streams faster: 206 against 37 output tokens per second.
- Which has the larger context window?
- Gemini 3.5 Flash accepts more context: 1.0M against 1M tokens.