Gemini 4 Argon vs GPT-5 Pro
Gemini 4 Argon 
GPT-5 Pro Verdict
- Gemini 4 Argon (high) leads on quality: 70.0 vs 60.2.
- Gemini 4 Argon (high) is stronger in agents & tools, coding, composite, human preference, knowledge, long context, maths, reasoning.
- GPT-5 Pro is stronger in multimodal.
- Gemini 4 Argon (high) is 10× cheaper ($4.00 vs $41.25 per 1M blended).
| Metric | Gemini 4 Argon (high) | GPT-5 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| BenchLeader Index | 70.0 | 60.2 |
| Agents & tools score | 67.5 | – |
| Coding score | 72.1 | – |
| Composite score | 89.2 | – |
| Human preference score | 73.2 | – |
| Knowledge score | 75.7 | 67.0 |
| Long context score | 65.0 | – |
| Maths score | 71.9 | – |
| Reasoning score | 82.0 | 56.3 |
| Multimodal score | – | 67.4 |
| Blended price $/M | $4.00 | $41.25 |
| Context window | 1M | 400k |
| Humanity's Last Exam | – | 31.6% |
| SimpleBench | – | 61.6% |
| SciCode | 61.8% | – |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | – | 150.3 |
| LMArena Text | 1525 | – |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1551 | – |
| LMArena Coding | 1562 | – |
| LMArena WebDev | 1678 | – |
| LMArena Agent | 9.3 | – |
| AA Intelligence Index v4.3.2 | 52.6 | – |
| AA-LCR | 79.7% | – |
| AA-Omniscience | 42.4 | – |
| Humanity's Last Exam (AA) | 57.1% | – |
| SciCode (AA) | 61.8% | – |
| IOI | 100.0% | – |
| LegalBench | 88.3% | – |
| Vals Index | 68.9 | – |
| PRBench Finance | – | 51.1% |
| PRBench Legal | – | 49.9% |
| VISTA | – | 52.4% |
| MultiNRC | – | 65.2% |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | – | 76.8% |
| ARC-AGI-1 | – | 70.2% |
| ARC-AGI-2 | – | 18.3% |
| CritPt | 27.1% | – |
| GDPval-AA v2.1 | 56.3% | – |
| BioMysteryBench | 76.3% | – |
| Code Migration | 68.2% | – |
| CUA-bench | 4.8% | – |
| CyberBench | 77.9% | – |
| Excel Modeling Benchmark | 75.2% | – |
| Finance Agent v2 | 65.4% | – |
| Harvey's Legal Agent Benchmark | 19.6% | – |
| Legal Research Bench | 54.8% | – |
| MedCode | 58.8% | – |
| MedScribe | 87.4% | – |
| MysteryMechanism | 45.5% | – |
| ProgramBench | 2.5% | – |
| Public Benefits Bench | 69.8% | – |
| SAGE | 53.6% | – |
| SREBench | 44.3% | – |
| Tax Agent Bench | 76.2% | – |
| Terminal-Bench 4.0 (Vals) | 57.6% | – |
| Terminal-Bench Science | 44.3% | – |
| Vibe Code Bench v1.1 | 91.9% | – |
| FORTRESS | – | 15.2% |
| MASK | – | 86.0% |
| LMArena Maths | 1528 | – |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1519 | – |
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1529 | – |
| LMArena Multi-turn | 1553 | – |
| LMArena Longer Queries | 1545 | – |
| FrontierSWE | 55.0% | – |
| Terminal-Bench 4.0 (AA) | 57.1% | – |
| AutomationBench | 77.5% | – |
| GDP.pdf | 21.8% | – |
| AA-Omniscience: accuracy | 49.9% | – |
| AA-Omniscience: non-hallucination | 84.9% | – |
| AA-Briefcase v1.1 | 1488 | – |
| DeepSearchQA | – | 65.2% |
Data as of 2026-10-11. Best configuration of each model; every score links to its source on the model pages.
Gemini 4 Argon vs GPT-5 Pro: questions
- Is Gemini 4 Argon better than GPT-5 Pro?
- Gemini 4 Argon (high) leads on quality: 70.0 vs 60.2. The BenchLeader Index combines every independent quality benchmark; Gemini 4 Argon (high) is ahead overall as of 2026-10-11, but check the category scores for your use.
- Which is cheaper, Gemini 4 Argon or GPT-5 Pro?
- Gemini 4 Argon is cheaper: $4.00 against $41.25 per million tokens, blended at three input tokens per output token.
- Which has the larger context window?
- Gemini 4 Argon accepts more context: 1M against 400k tokens.