GPT-6 Sol vs Qwen3.8 Max
GPT-6 Sol 
Qwen3.8 Max Verdict
- GPT-6 Sol (max) leads on quality: 65.6 vs 64.2.
- GPT-6 Sol (max) is stronger in agents & tools, coding, composite, knowledge, long context, maths.
- Qwen3.8 Max (max) is stronger in human preference, multimodal, reasoning.
- Qwen3.8 Max (max) is 1.3× cheaper ($3.00 vs $4.00 per 1M blended).
- GPT-6 Sol (max) streams 2.3× faster (86 vs 37 tokens per second).
| Metric | GPT-6 Sol (max) | Qwen3.8 Max (max) |
|---|---|---|
| BenchLeader Index | 65.6 | 64.2 |
| Agents & tools score | 60.3 | 58.2 |
| Coding score | 67.6 | 64.6 |
| Composite score | 73.1 | 70.7 |
| Human preference score | 64.7 | 68.0 |
| Knowledge score | 70.1 | 62.7 |
| Long context score | 67.1 | 65.4 |
| Maths score | 69.5 | 65.1 |
| Multimodal score | 61.9 | 66.2 |
| Reasoning score | 71.8 | 72.2 |
| Blended price $/M | $4.00 | $3.00 |
| Output speed | 86 tok/s | 37 tok/s |
| Time to first answer | 130.4 s | 58.9 s |
| Context window | 1.1M | 1M |
| GPQA Diamond | 94.3% | – |
| FrontierMath Tiers 1–3 | 89.8% | – |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 90.0% | – |
| OTIS Mock AIME | 100.0% | – |
| SimpleQA Verified | 60.7% | – |
| Terminal-Bench | 49.4% | 27.0% |
| SciCode | 57.6% | 53.2% |
| APEX-Agents | 54.3% | 63.3% |
| FrontierCode | 49.3% | – |
| ProofBench | – | 58.0% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | – | 156.4 |
| LMArena Text | 1456 | 1483 |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1482 | 1504 |
| LMArena Coding | 1519 | 1524 |
| LMArena WebDev | 1688 | 1672 |
| LMArena Vision | 1245 | 1314 |
| LMArena Agent | 9.9 | 2.3 |
| LiveBench | 79.3% | 78.5% |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 88.7% | 88.2% |
| LiveBench Coding | 81.8% | 72.9% |
| LiveBench Agentic Coding | 52.9% | 64.7% |
| LiveBench Mathematics | 96.4% | 91.3% |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 81.2% | 78.4% |
| LiveBench Language | 85.3% | 79.7% |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 68.6% | 74.1% |
| AA Intelligence Index v4.3.2 | 47.6 | 45.4 |
| AA-LCR | 83.7% | 80.3% |
| MMMU-Pro | 83.0% | 82.8% |
| AA-Omniscience | 27.1 | 12.0 |
| GPQA Diamond (AA) | – | 92.8% |
| Humanity's Last Exam (AA) | 47.9% | 43.1% |
| SciCode (AA) | 57.6% | 53.2% |
| LiveCodeBench | – | 87.8% |
| MMLU-Pro | – | 88.6% |
| IOI | 82.6% | 68.9% |
| LegalBench | – | 83.6% |
| CorpFin | – | 65.8% |
| TaxEval | – | 75.5% |
| Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals) | 83.2% | 67.4% |
| SWE-bench (Vals) | – | 85.6% |
| GPQA Diamond (Vals) | – | 93.7% |
| Vals Index | 57.5 | 48.3 |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 95.5% | – |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 89.6% | – |
| ARC-AGI-3 | 23.0% | – |
| CritPt | 30.9% | 20.0% |
| GDPval-AA v2.1 | 50.4% | 58.6% |
| τ³-Banking (AA) | – | 51.3% |
| ITBench SRE (AA) | 49.4% | 40.3% |
| Analyst Agent (AA) | – | 45.0% |
| APEX-Agents (AA) | – | 42.4% |
| BioMysteryBench | 74.8% | – |
| Code Migration | 57.2% | 24.0% |
| CyberBench | 78.0% | 28.6% |
| Excel Modeling Benchmark | 71.5% | 60.1% |
| Finance Agent v2 | 49.0% | 50.6% |
| Harvey's Legal Agent Benchmark | 1.7% | 10.4% |
| Legal Research Bench | 28.9% | 47.6% |
| MedCode | 47.1% | 40.7% |
| MedScribe | 82.0% | 85.0% |
| MMMU-Pro (Vals) | – | 88.0% |
| MortgageTax | – | 64.0% |
| MysteryMechanism | 30.2% | 23.9% |
| ProgramBench | 2.0% | 0.0% |
| Public Benefits Bench | 56.6% | 67.1% |
| SAGE | 44.8% | 51.3% |
| SkillsBench | – | 42.0% |
| Tax Agent Bench | 53.0% | 66.0% |
| Terminal-Bench 4.0 (Vals) | 44.4% | 34.3% |
| Terminal-Bench Science | 30.0% | 1.4% |
| Vals Multimodal Index | – | 65.4% |
| Vibe Code Bench 1-100 | – | 12.8% |
| Vibe Code Bench v1.1 | 87.8% | 64.7% |
| LMArena Maths | 1446 | 1497 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1436 | 1470 |
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1451 | 1474 |
| LMArena Multi-turn | 1467 | 1492 |
| LMArena Longer Queries | 1463 | 1492 |
| EBR-bench | 53.3% | – |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | 56.0% | – |
| LMCA | 59.1% | – |
| DTBench | 97.3% | – |
| ALE-Bench | 2462 | – |
| GDP.pdf | 26.4% | – |
| Terminal-Bench 4.0 (AA) | 43.9% | 38.9% |
| Terminal-Bench 2.1 (AA) | – | 88.8% |
| AutomationBench | 61.6% | 56.2% |
| GDP.pdf | 25.2% | 22.8% |
| MLCR | 16.1% | 20.0% |
| Harvey LAB | 3.6% | – |
| EnterpriseOps-Gym | – | 47.6% |
| AA-Omniscience: accuracy | 54.5% | 31.9% |
| AA-Omniscience: non-hallucination | 39.9% | 71.2% |
| AA-Briefcase v1.1 | 1480 | 1617 |
Data as of 2026-10-11. Best configuration of each model; every score links to its source on the model pages.
GPT-6 Sol vs Qwen3.8 Max: questions
- Is GPT-6 Sol better than Qwen3.8 Max?
- GPT-6 Sol (max) leads on quality: 65.6 vs 64.2. The BenchLeader Index combines every independent quality benchmark; GPT-6 Sol (max) is ahead overall as of 2026-10-11, but check the category scores for your use.
- Is GPT-6 Sol better than Qwen3.8 Max for coding?
- GPT-6 Sol scores higher in coding (68 vs 65 on the category index, where 50 is average).
- Is GPT-6 Sol better than Qwen3.8 Max for agentic tasks?
- GPT-6 Sol scores higher in agentic tasks (60 vs 58 on the category index, where 50 is average).
- Which is cheaper, GPT-6 Sol or Qwen3.8 Max?
- Qwen3.8 Max is cheaper: $3.00 against $4.00 per million tokens, blended at three input tokens per output token.
- Which is faster, GPT-6 Sol or Qwen3.8 Max?
- GPT-6 Sol streams faster: 86 against 37 output tokens per second.
- Which has the larger context window?
- GPT-6 Sol accepts more context: 1.1M against 1M tokens.