Muse Spark vs Qwen3.8 Max
Muse Spark 
Qwen3.8 Max Verdict
- Muse Spark and Qwen3.8 Max (max) are level on quality (64.6 vs 64.2).
- Muse Spark is stronger in agents & tools, coding, human preference, instruction following, knowledge.
- Qwen3.8 Max (max) is stronger in composite, long context, maths, multimodal, reasoning.
| Metric | Muse Spark | Qwen3.8 Max (max) |
|---|---|---|
| BenchLeader Index | 64.6 | 64.2 |
| Agents & tools score | 66.0 | 58.2 |
| Coding score | 65.3 | 64.6 |
| Composite score | 65.0 | 70.7 |
| Human preference score | 68.7 | 68.0 |
| Instruction following score | 78.3 | – |
| Knowledge score | 63.7 | 62.7 |
| Long context score | 64.2 | 65.4 |
| Maths score | 59.3 | 65.1 |
| Multimodal score | 64.6 | 66.2 |
| Reasoning score | 65.9 | 72.2 |
| Blended price $/M | – | $3.00 |
| Output speed | – | 37 tok/s |
| Time to first answer | – | 58.9 s |
| Context window | 262k | 1M |
| GPQA Diamond | 89.8% | – |
| OTIS Mock AIME | 88.9% | – |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 40.6% | – |
| Terminal-Bench | – | 27.0% |
| SciCode | 51.5% | 53.2% |
| APEX-Agents | – | 63.3% |
| ProofBench | 17.0% | 58.0% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 152.0 | 156.4 |
| LMArena Text | 1489 | 1483 |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1506 | 1504 |
| LMArena Coding | 1529 | 1524 |
| LMArena WebDev | – | 1672 |
| LMArena Vision | 1306 | 1314 |
| LMArena Agent | – | 2.3 |
| LiveBench | – | 78.5% |
| LiveBench Reasoning | – | 88.2% |
| LiveBench Coding | – | 72.9% |
| LiveBench Agentic Coding | – | 64.7% |
| LiveBench Mathematics | – | 91.3% |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | – | 78.4% |
| LiveBench Language | – | 79.7% |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | – | 74.1% |
| AA Intelligence Index v4.3.2 | 31.3 | 45.4 |
| IFBench | 75.9% | – |
| AA-LCR | 78.0% | 80.3% |
| MMMU-Pro | 80.5% | 82.8% |
| AA-Omniscience | 7.2 | 12.0 |
| Terminal-Bench Hard | 45.5% | – |
| GPQA Diamond (AA) | 88.4% | 92.8% |
| Humanity's Last Exam (AA) | 40.7% | 43.1% |
| SciCode (AA) | – | 53.2% |
| τ²-Bench Telecom (AA) | 91.5% | – |
| AIME (Vals) | 96.9% | – |
| LiveCodeBench | – | 87.8% |
| MMLU-Pro | 87.3% | 88.6% |
| IOI | – | 68.9% |
| LegalBench | 84.2% | 83.6% |
| CorpFin | 65.1% | 65.8% |
| TaxEval | 77.7% | 75.5% |
| Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals) | – | 67.4% |
| SWE-bench (Vals) | 74.4% | 85.6% |
| GPQA Diamond (Vals) | 89.7% | 93.7% |
| Vals Index | – | 48.3 |
| SWE-Bench Pro | 55.0% | – |
| MCP Atlas | 82.2% | – |
| MultiChallenge | 75.5% | – |
| PRBench Finance | 52.4% | – |
| PRBench Legal | 52.3% | – |
| MultiNRC | 59.0% | – |
| TutorBench | 68.5% | – |
| CritPt | 11.3% | 20.0% |
| GDPval-AA v2.1 | 25.1% | 58.6% |
| τ³-Banking (AA) | – | 51.3% |
| ITBench SRE (AA) | – | 40.3% |
| Analyst Agent (AA) | – | 45.0% |
| APEX-Agents (AA) | – | 42.4% |
| CaseLaw v2 | 63.1% | – |
| Code Migration | – | 24.0% |
| CyberBench | – | 28.6% |
| Excel Modeling Benchmark | – | 60.1% |
| Finance Agent v2 | – | 50.6% |
| Harvey's Legal Agent Benchmark | – | 10.4% |
| Legal Research Bench | – | 47.6% |
| MedCode | 51.3% | 40.7% |
| MedScribe | 85.9% | 85.0% |
| MMMU-Pro (Vals) | 87.4% | 88.0% |
| MortgageTax | – | 64.0% |
| MysteryMechanism | – | 23.9% |
| ProgramBench | – | 0.0% |
| Public Benefits Bench | – | 67.1% |
| SAGE | – | 51.3% |
| SkillsBench | – | 42.0% |
| Tax Agent Bench | – | 66.0% |
| Terminal-Bench 2.0 (Vals) | 59.5% | – |
| Terminal-Bench 4.0 (Vals) | – | 34.3% |
| Terminal-Bench Science | – | 1.4% |
| Vals Multimodal Index | – | 65.4% |
| Vibe Code Bench 1-100 | – | 12.8% |
| Vibe Code Bench v1.1 | 19.7% | 64.7% |
| FORTRESS | 20.2% | – |
| SWE-Bench Pro (private) | 55.0% | – |
| SWE Atlas: Codebase QnA | 24.2% | – |
| SWE Atlas: Test Writing | 31.1% | – |
| LMArena Maths | 1466 | 1497 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1465 | 1470 |
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1464 | 1474 |
| LMArena Multi-turn | 1493 | 1492 |
| LMArena Longer Queries | 1476 | 1492 |
| LMArena Document | 1467 | – |
| Terminal-Bench 4.0 (AA) | – | 38.9% |
| Terminal-Bench 2.1 (AA) | 62.2% | 88.8% |
| AutomationBench | – | 56.2% |
| GDP.pdf | – | 22.8% |
| MLCR | – | 20.0% |
| EnterpriseOps-Gym | – | 47.6% |
| AA-Omniscience: accuracy | 49.6% | 31.9% |
| AA-Omniscience: non-hallucination | 15.8% | 71.2% |
| AA-Briefcase v1.1 | – | 1617 |
Data as of 2026-10-11. Best configuration of each model; every score links to its source on the model pages.
Muse Spark vs Qwen3.8 Max: questions
- Is Muse Spark better than Qwen3.8 Max?
- Muse Spark and Qwen3.8 Max (max) are level on quality (64.6 vs 64.2). The BenchLeader Index combines every independent quality benchmark; Muse Spark is ahead overall as of 2026-10-11, but check the category scores for your use.
- Is Muse Spark better than Qwen3.8 Max for coding?
- Muse Spark scores higher in coding (65 vs 65 on the category index, where 50 is average).
- Is Muse Spark better than Qwen3.8 Max for agentic tasks?
- Muse Spark scores higher in agentic tasks (66 vs 58 on the category index, where 50 is average).
- Which has the larger context window?
- Qwen3.8 Max accepts more context: 1M against 262k tokens.