BenchLeader

Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs Muse Spark 1.3

Verdict
  • Claude Sonnet 5.5 (max) and Muse Spark 1.3 (max) are level on quality (67.6 vs 67.7).
  • Claude Sonnet 5.5 (max) is stronger in coding, maths, reasoning.
  • Muse Spark 1.3 (max) is stronger in agents & tools, composite, knowledge, long context, human preference, multimodal.
  • Muse Spark 1.3 (max) is 2.0× cheaper ($2.00 vs $4.00 per 1M blended).
MetricClaude Sonnet 5.5 (max)Muse Spark 1.3 (max)
BenchLeader Index67.667.7
Agents & tools score69.570.3
Coding score69.864.6
Composite score72.684.1
Knowledge score65.472.9
Long context score66.666.8
Maths score72.963.6
Reasoning score81.178.1
Human preference score–69.4
Multimodal score–65.9
Blended price $/M$4.00$2.00
Output speed141 tok/s175 tok/s
Time to first answer487.1 s70.5 s
Context window1M1.0M
GPQA Diamond95.6%–
FrontierMath Tiers 1–388.8%74.0%
FrontierMath Tier 480.5%46.3%
OTIS Mock AIME100.0%–
SimpleQA Verified46.5%–
Terminal-Bench61.8%–
SciCode61.0%58.8%
APEX-Agents75.5%–
ProofBench100.0%58.0%
LMArena Text–1494
LMArena Hard Prompts–1517
LMArena Coding–1538
LMArena WebDev–1657
LMArena Vision–1309
LMArena Agent124
LiveBench75.7%–
LiveBench Reasoning91.6%–
LiveBench Coding91.4%–
LiveBench Agentic Coding56.3%–
LiveBench Mathematics96.1%–
LiveBench Data Analysis59.5%–
LiveBench Language78.0%–
LiveBench Instruction Following56.8%–
AA Intelligence Index v4.3.25648.1
AA-LCR82.7%83.0%
AA-Omniscience32.325
GPQA Diamond (AA)–93.5%
Humanity's Last Exam (AA)55.0%48.7%
SciCode (AA)61.0%58.8%
IOI–56.6%
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals)–79.0%
Vals Index–58.2
CritPt31.4%24.9%
GDPval-AA v2.167.0%59.0%
τ³-Banking (AA)–50.5%
ITBench SRE (AA)–33.2%
Analyst Agent (AA)57.5%–
Code Migration–47.4%
CUA-bench–5.8%
CyberBench–72.7%
Excel Modeling Benchmark–67.4%
Finance Agent v2–60.0%
Harvey's Legal Agent Benchmark–23.8%
Legal Research Bench–55.3%
MysteryMechanism–36.0%
Tax Agent Bench–72.4%
Terminal-Bench 4.0 (Vals)–24.8%
Terminal-Bench Science–10.0%
Vibe Code Bench 1-100–20.5%
Vibe Code Bench v1.1–85.9%
LMArena Maths–1502
LMArena Creative Writing–1456
LMArena Instruction Following–1483
LMArena Multi-turn–1487
LMArena Longer Queries–1497
LMArena Document–1468
Chess Puzzles–38.0%
Mystery Game Puzzles65.0%25.0%
CursorBench55.5%41.6%
FrontierSWE61.9%–
Terminal-Bench 4.0 (AA)63.6%33.3%
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (AA)–84.3%
AutomationBench71.8%57.9%
GDP.pdf25.8%26.6%
MLCR75.0%43.3%
Harvey LAB2.8%8.9%
AA-Omniscience: accuracy54.0%43.6%
AA-Omniscience: non-hallucination53.0%67.1%
AA-Briefcase v1.118231581

Data as of 2026-10-11. Best configuration of each model; every score links to its source on the model pages.

Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs Muse Spark 1.3: questions

Is Claude Sonnet 5.5 better than Muse Spark 1.3?
Claude Sonnet 5.5 (max) and Muse Spark 1.3 (max) are level on quality (67.6 vs 67.7). The BenchLeader Index combines every independent quality benchmark; Muse Spark 1.3 (max) is ahead overall as of 2026-10-11, but check the category scores for your use.
Is Claude Sonnet 5.5 better than Muse Spark 1.3 for coding?
Claude Sonnet 5.5 scores higher in coding (70 vs 65 on the category index, where 50 is average).
Is Claude Sonnet 5.5 better than Muse Spark 1.3 for agentic tasks?
Muse Spark 1.3 scores higher in agentic tasks (70 vs 70 on the category index, where 50 is average).
Which is cheaper, Claude Sonnet 5.5 or Muse Spark 1.3?
Muse Spark 1.3 is cheaper: $2.00 against $4.00 per million tokens, blended at three input tokens per output token.
Which is faster, Claude Sonnet 5.5 or Muse Spark 1.3?
Muse Spark 1.3 streams faster: 175 against 141 output tokens per second.
Which has the larger context window?
Muse Spark 1.3 accepts more context: 1.0M against 1M tokens.