DeepSeek V4 Pro vs Grok 4.7
DeepSeek V4 Pro 
Grok 4.7 Verdict
- Grok 4.7 (high) leads on quality: 65.8 vs 64.1.
- DeepSeek V4 Pro (max) is stronger in agents & tools, coding, instruction following, long context, maths.
- Grok 4.7 (high) is stronger in composite, knowledge, reasoning.
- DeepSeek V4 Pro (max) is 5.5× cheaper ($0.544 vs $3.00 per 1M blended).
- DeepSeek V4 Pro (max) streams 2.0× faster (108 vs 55 tokens per second).
| Metric | DeepSeek V4 Pro (max) | Grok 4.7 (high) |
|---|---|---|
| BenchLeader Index | 64.1 | 65.8 |
| Agents & tools score | 70.2 | – |
| Coding score | 58.8 | – |
| Composite score | 74.4 | 87.5 |
| Instruction following score | 74.3 | – |
| Knowledge score | 58.1 | 72.6 |
| Long context score | 66.6 | 64.8 |
| Maths score | 53.6 | – |
| Reasoning score | 70.8 | 76.4 |
| Blended price $/M | $0.544 | $3.00 |
| Output speed | 108 tok/s | 55 tok/s |
| Time to first answer | 42.5 s | 1.4 s |
| Context window | 1M | 500k |
| GPQA Diamond | 89.7% | – |
| FrontierMath Tiers 1–3 | 45.3% | – |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 2.4% | – |
| OTIS Mock AIME | 96.7% | – |
| SWE-bench Verified (Epoch) | 77.6% | – |
| SimpleQA Verified | 47.0% | – |
| SciCode | 50.0% | – |
| WeirdML | 48.9% | – |
| ProofBench | 16.0% | – |
| AA Intelligence Index | 36 | 46.3 |
| IFBench | 76.5% | – |
| AA-LCR | 80.3% | 77.0% |
| AA-Omniscience | 0.8 | 30.9 |
| Terminal-Bench Hard | 46.2% | – |
| GPQA Diamond (AA) | 92.8% | – |
| Humanity's Last Exam (AA) | 41.0% | 42.3% |
| SciCode (AA) | 51.0% | 57.8% |
| τ²-Bench Telecom (AA) | 96.2% | – |
| LiveCodeBench | 87.5% | – |
| MMLU-Pro | 87.3% | – |
| LegalBench | 80.3% | 85.1% |
| CorpFin | 61.4% | – |
| TaxEval | 72.1% | – |
| SWE-bench (Vals) | 77.4% | – |
| GPQA Diamond (Vals) | 89.4% | – |
| Vals Index | 42.9 | – |
| AIME 2026 | 96.7% | – |
| HMMT February 2026 | 93.9% | – |
| MathArena Apex | 28.1% | – |
| CritPt | 18.0% | 18.0% |
| GDPval (AA) | 47.1% | 59.7% |
| τ²-Bench Banking (AA) | 39.6% | – |
| ITBench SRE (AA) | 38.3% | – |
| Analyst Agent (AA) | 18.8% | – |
| APEX-Agents (AA) | 24.3% | – |
| CaseLaw v2 | 59.4% | – |
| Code Migration | 26.2% | 34.7% |
| Excel Modeling Benchmark | 51.6% | 54.9% |
| Finance Agent v2 | 44.1% | – |
| Harvey's Legal Agent Benchmark | 3.8% | 19.6% |
| Legal Research Bench | 23.1% | 39.9% |
| MedCode | 40.5% | 48.7% |
| MedScribe | 75.1% | 87.2% |
| ProgramBench | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Public Benefits Bench | 62.9% | 68.5% |
| SAGE | – | 31.0% |
| SkillsBench | 51.3% | – |
| Vibe Code Bench v1.1 | 49.9% | – |
| Chess Puzzles | 20.0% | – |
| LMCA | 41.2% | – |
| DTBench | 90.7% | – |
Data as of 2026-09-21. Best configuration of each model; every score links to its source on the model pages.
DeepSeek V4 Pro vs Grok 4.7: questions
- Is DeepSeek V4 Pro better than Grok 4.7?
- Grok 4.7 (high) leads on quality: 65.8 vs 64.1. The BenchLeader Index combines every independent quality benchmark; Grok 4.7 (high) is ahead overall as of 2026-09-21, but check the category scores for your use.
- Which is cheaper, DeepSeek V4 Pro or Grok 4.7?
- DeepSeek V4 Pro is cheaper: $0.544 against $3.00 per million tokens, blended at three input tokens per output token.
- Which is faster, DeepSeek V4 Pro or Grok 4.7?
- DeepSeek V4 Pro streams faster: 108 against 55 output tokens per second.
- Which has the larger context window?
- DeepSeek V4 Pro accepts more context: 1M against 500k tokens.