Gemini 4 Argon vs GLM 5.2
Gemini 4 Argon 
GLM 5.2 Verdict
- Gemini 4 Argon (high) leads on quality: 70.0 vs 62.6.
- Gemini 4 Argon (high) is stronger in agents & tools, coding, composite, human preference, knowledge, long context, maths, reasoning.
- GLM 5.2 (max) is stronger in instruction following.
- GLM 5.2 (max) is 1.9× cheaper ($2.15 vs $4.00 per 1M blended).
| Metric | Gemini 4 Argon (high) | GLM 5.2 (max) |
|---|---|---|
| BenchLeader Index | 70.0 | 62.6 |
| Agents & tools score | 67.5 | 62.9 |
| Coding score | 72.1 | 62.4 |
| Composite score | 89.2 | 67.7 |
| Human preference score | 73.2 | 67.0 |
| Knowledge score | 75.7 | 54.0 |
| Long context score | 65.0 | 64.3 |
| Maths score | 71.9 | 57.7 |
| Reasoning score | 82.0 | 70.2 |
| Instruction following score | – | 71.6 |
| Blended price $/M | $4.00 | $2.15 |
| Output speed | – | 82 tok/s |
| Time to first answer | – | 28.4 s |
| Context window | 1M | 1M |
| GPQA Diamond | – | 91.9% |
| FrontierMath Tiers 1–3 | – | 59.2% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | – | 29.3% |
| OTIS Mock AIME | – | 86.4% |
| SWE-bench Verified (Epoch) | – | 78.7% |
| SimpleQA Verified | – | 34.2% |
| SciCode | 61.8% | 50.5% |
| WeirdML | – | 70.1% |
| ProofBench | – | 35.0% |
| LMArena Text | 1525 | 1475 |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1551 | 1495 |
| LMArena Coding | 1562 | 1512 |
| LMArena WebDev | 1678 | 1603 |
| LMArena Agent | 9.3 | 3.2 |
| AA Intelligence Index v4.3.2 | 52.6 | 33.7 |
| IFBench | – | 73.3% |
| AA-LCR | 79.7% | 78.3% |
| AA-Omniscience | 42.4 | 4.4 |
| Terminal-Bench Hard | – | 50.8% |
| GPQA Diamond (AA) | – | 89.5% |
| Humanity's Last Exam (AA) | 57.1% | 41.1% |
| SciCode (AA) | 61.8% | 51.2% |
| τ²-Bench Telecom (AA) | – | 99.1% |
| IOI | 100.0% | – |
| LegalBench | 88.3% | – |
| Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals) | – | 67.8% |
| SWE-bench (Vals) | – | 82.8% |
| Vals Index | 68.9 | – |
| CritPt | 27.1% | 20.9% |
| GDPval-AA v2.1 | 56.3% | 43.7% |
| τ³-Banking (AA) | – | 34.6% |
| ITBench SRE (AA) | – | 42.7% |
| APEX-Agents (AA) | – | 33.7% |
| BioMysteryBench | 76.3% | – |
| Code Migration | 68.2% | 37.9% |
| CUA-bench | 4.8% | – |
| CyberBench | 77.9% | – |
| Excel Modeling Benchmark | 75.2% | – |
| Finance Agent v2 | 65.4% | – |
| Harvey's Legal Agent Benchmark | 19.6% | – |
| Legal Research Bench | 54.8% | 31.3% |
| MedCode | 58.8% | – |
| MedScribe | 87.4% | – |
| MysteryMechanism | 45.5% | – |
| ProgramBench | 2.5% | 0.5% |
| Public Benefits Bench | 69.8% | – |
| SAGE | 53.6% | – |
| SkillsBench | – | 45.1% |
| SREBench | 44.3% | 0.0% |
| Tax Agent Bench | 76.2% | – |
| Terminal-Bench 4.0 (Vals) | 57.6% | – |
| Terminal-Bench Science | 44.3% | – |
| Vibe Code Bench v1.1 | 91.9% | 64.0% |
| LMArena Maths | 1528 | 1486 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1519 | 1453 |
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1529 | 1469 |
| LMArena Multi-turn | 1553 | 1475 |
| LMArena Longer Queries | 1545 | 1486 |
| Chess Puzzles | – | 21.0% |
| EBR-bench | – | 9.5% |
| PostTrainBench | – | 31.7% |
| DeepSWE v1.1 | – | 43.8% |
| LMCA | – | 45.8% |
| DTBench | – | 93.6% |
| ALE-Bench | – | 1010.2 |
| FrontierSWE | 55.0% | – |
| Terminal-Bench 4.0 (AA) | 57.1% | 1.0% |
| Terminal-Bench 2.1 (AA) | – | 77.9% |
| AutomationBench | 77.5% | – |
| GDP.pdf | 21.8% | – |
| AA-Omniscience: accuracy | 49.9% | 24.3% |
| AA-Omniscience: non-hallucination | 84.9% | 73.7% |
| AA-Briefcase v1.1 | 1488 | – |
Data as of 2026-10-11. Best configuration of each model; every score links to its source on the model pages.
Gemini 4 Argon vs GLM 5.2: questions
- Is Gemini 4 Argon better than GLM 5.2?
- Gemini 4 Argon (high) leads on quality: 70.0 vs 62.6. The BenchLeader Index combines every independent quality benchmark; Gemini 4 Argon (high) is ahead overall as of 2026-10-11, but check the category scores for your use.
- Is Gemini 4 Argon better than GLM 5.2 for coding?
- Gemini 4 Argon scores higher in coding (72 vs 62 on the category index, where 50 is average).
- Is Gemini 4 Argon better than GLM 5.2 for agentic tasks?
- Gemini 4 Argon scores higher in agentic tasks (68 vs 63 on the category index, where 50 is average).
- Which is cheaper, Gemini 4 Argon or GLM 5.2?
- GLM 5.2 is cheaper: $2.15 against $4.00 per million tokens, blended at three input tokens per output token.
- Which has the larger context window?
- Both accept 1M tokens of context.