Gemini 4 Argon vs Muse Wonder
As of 13 Oct 2026, Gemini 4 Argon (high) is the better pick for most workloads: it leads on quality (69.8 vs 66.3 on the BenchLeader Index) and costs 2.0× less.
Gemini 4 Argon 
Muse Wonder Key differences
- Gemini 4 Argon (high) leads on quality: 69.8 vs 66.3.
- Gemini 4 Argon (high) is stronger in agents & tools, coding, composite, human preference, knowledge, maths.
- Muse Wonder (max) is stronger in long context, reasoning.
- Gemini 4 Argon (high) is 2.0× cheaper ($4.00 vs $8.00 per 1M blended).
Choose Gemini 4 Argon (high) if
- knowledge is the priority (76 vs 73 on the category score)
- cost matters: $4.00 against $8.00 per million tokens blended
Choose Muse Wonder (max) if
- reasoning is the priority (88 vs 82 on the category score)
Category by category
Category scores on the BenchLeader scale: 50 is the average evaluated model, 15 points is one standard deviation. A gap under one point is called level.
| Category | Gemini 4 Argon (high) | Muse Wonder (max) | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Reasoning | 81.6 | 87.8 | Muse Wonder |
| Coding | 72.1 | – | not comparable |
| Agents & tools | 67.5 | – | not comparable |
| Maths | 71.9 | – | not comparable |
| Knowledge | 75.5 | 73.0 | Gemini 4 Argon |
| Human preference | 73.2 | – | not comparable |
| Long context | 65.0 | 65.5 | level |
| Composite | 88.6 | 78.2 | Gemini 4 Argon |
Price, speed and latency
List prices blended at three input tokens per output token. Per-task prices use the token counts on the methodology page; suite cost is what Artificial Analysis paid to run its whole Intelligence Index.
| Measure | Gemini 4 Argon (high) | Muse Wonder (max) |
|---|---|---|
| Blended price per 1M tokens | $4.00 | $8.00 |
| Input / output per 1M | $2.00 / $10.00 | $4.00 / $20.00 |
| Price per task: chat reply | $0.0038 | $0.0076 |
| Price per task: summarise a 30-page report | $0.030 | $0.060 |
| Price per task: code edit | $0.027 | $0.054 |
| Price per task: agentic coding session | $0.160 | $0.320 |
| Price per task: structured extraction | $0.0060 | $0.012 |
| Cost to run a full benchmark suite | $1.99 | $4.52 |
| Output speed | – | 85 tok/s |
| Time to first answer | – | 60.8 s |
| Time to a complete answer | – | 66.7 s |
Every benchmark
| Metric | Gemini 4 Argon (high) | Muse Wonder (max) |
|---|---|---|
| BenchLeader Index | 69.8 | 66.3 |
| Agents & tools score | 67.5 | – |
| Coding score | 72.1 | – |
| Composite score | 88.6 | 78.2 |
| Human preference score | 73.2 | – |
| Knowledge score | 75.5 | 73.0 |
| Long context score | 65.0 | 65.5 |
| Maths score | 71.9 | – |
| Reasoning score | 81.6 | 87.8 |
| Blended price $/M | $4.00 | $8.00 |
| Output speed | – | 85 tok/s |
| Time to first answer | – | 60.8 s |
| Context window | 1M | 1.0M |
| SciCode | 61.8% | – |
| LMArena Text | 1525 | – |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1551 | – |
| LMArena Coding | 1562 | – |
| LMArena WebDev | 1678 | – |
| LMArena Agent | 9.3 | – |
| LiveBench | – | 81.2% |
| LiveBench Reasoning | – | 90.6% |
| LiveBench Coding | – | 80.7% |
| LiveBench Agentic Coding | – | 62.7% |
| LiveBench Mathematics | – | 96.5% |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | – | 81.6% |
| LiveBench Language | – | 82.9% |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | – | 73.0% |
| AA Intelligence Index v4.3.2 | 52.6 | 52.4 |
| AA-LCR | 79.7% | 80.7% |
| AA-Omniscience | 42.4 | 25.5 |
| Humanity's Last Exam (AA) | 57.1% | 50.1% |
| SciCode (AA) | 61.8% | 60.3% |
| IOI | 100.0% | – |
| LegalBench | 88.3% | – |
| Vals Index | 68.9 | – |
| CritPt | 27.1% | 28.3% |
| GDPval-AA v2.1 | 56.2% | 63.5% |
| BioMysteryBench | 76.3% | – |
| Code Migration | 68.2% | – |
| CUA-bench | 4.8% | – |
| CyberBench | 77.9% | – |
| Excel Modeling Benchmark | 75.2% | – |
| Finance Agent v2 | 65.4% | – |
| Harvey's Legal Agent Benchmark | 19.6% | – |
| Legal Research Bench | 54.8% | – |
| MedCode | 58.8% | – |
| MedScribe | 87.4% | – |
| MysteryMechanism | 45.5% | – |
| ProgramBench | 2.5% | – |
| Public Benefits Bench | 69.8% | – |
| SAGE | 53.6% | – |
| SREBench | 44.3% | – |
| Tax Agent Bench | 76.2% | – |
| Terminal-Bench 4.0 (Vals) | 57.6% | – |
| Terminal-Bench Science | 44.3% | – |
| Vibe Code Bench v1.1 | 91.9% | – |
| LMArena Maths | 1528 | – |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1519 | – |
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1529 | – |
| LMArena Multi-turn | 1553 | – |
| LMArena Longer Queries | 1545 | – |
| FrontierSWE | 55.0% | – |
| Terminal-Bench 4.0 (AA) | 57.1% | 52.0% |
| AutomationBench | 77.5% | 68.1% |
| GDP.pdf | 21.8% | 30.6% |
| AA-Omniscience: accuracy | 49.9% | 41.1% |
| AA-Omniscience: non-hallucination | 84.9% | 73.5% |
| AA-Briefcase v1.1 | 1488 | 1659 |
Data as of 2026-10-13. Best configuration of each model; every score links to its source on the model pages.
Gemini 4 Argon vs Muse Wonder: questions
- Is Gemini 4 Argon better than Muse Wonder?
- Gemini 4 Argon (high) leads on quality: 69.8 vs 66.3. The BenchLeader Index combines every independent quality benchmark; Gemini 4 Argon (high) is ahead overall as of 2026-10-13, but check the category scores for your use.
- Which is cheaper, Gemini 4 Argon or Muse Wonder?
- Gemini 4 Argon is cheaper: $4.00 against $8.00 per million tokens, blended at three input tokens per output token.
- Which has the larger context window?
- Muse Wonder accepts more context: 1.0M against 1M tokens.