BenchLeader

GPT-6.1 Sol vs Grok 4.6

Verdict
  • GPT-6.1 Sol (max) leads on quality: 69.3 vs 64.2.
  • GPT-6.1 Sol (max) is stronger in coding, composite, human preference, knowledge, long context, maths, multimodal, reasoning.
  • Grok 4.6 (medium) is stronger in agents & tools.
  • Grok 4.6 (medium) is 1.3× cheaper ($3.00 vs $4.00 per 1M blended).
MetricGPT-6.1 Sol (max)Grok 4.6 (medium)
BenchLeader Index69.364.2
Agents & tools score63.973.6
Coding score72.461.1
Composite score79.078.1
Human preference score68.1–
Knowledge score78.874.3
Long context score66.865.7
Maths score72.5–
Multimodal score66.2–
Reasoning score76.464.5
Blended price $/M$4.00$3.00
Output speed56 tok/s55 tok/s
Time to first answer326.9 s33.9 s
Context window1.1M500k
GPQA Diamond95.4%–
FrontierMath Tiers 1–393.7%–
FrontierMath Tier 4100.0%–
OTIS Mock AIME100.0%–
SimpleQA Verified73.9%–
Terminal-Bench58.2%–
SciCode54.2%54.6%
APEX-Agents60.0%–
LMArena Text1484–
LMArena Hard Prompts1507–
LMArena Coding1545–
LMArena WebDev1755–
LMArena Vision1288–
LMArena Agent11.7–
LiveBench81.6%–
LiveBench Reasoning92.6%–
LiveBench Coding80.4%–
LiveBench Agentic Coding54.5%–
LiveBench Mathematics96.8%–
LiveBench Data Analysis82.7%–
LiveBench Language90.1%–
LiveBench Instruction Following74.2%–
AA Intelligence Index v4.3.251.842.8
AA-LCR83.0%81.0%
MMMU-Pro86.0%–
AA-Omniscience41.528
GPQA Diamond (AA)–93.5%
Humanity's Last Exam (AA)52.9%42.1%
SciCode (AA)54.2%55.9%
IOI96.9%–
Vals Index61.1–
ARC-AGI-196.5%87.5%
ARC-AGI-294.2%61.3%
ARC-AGI-396.2%–
CritPt31.7%17.7%
GDPval-AA v2.153.8%55.9%
τ³-Banking (AA)–44.3%
Analyst Agent (AA)50.0%–
BioMysteryBench79.6%–
Code Migration65.1%–
CyberBench39.3%–
Excel Modeling Benchmark70.8%–
Finance Agent v252.0%–
Harvey's Legal Agent Benchmark5.4%–
Legal Research Bench38.5%–
MedCode48.8%–
MedScribe86.5%–
MysteryMechanism46.4%–
Public Benefits Bench59.3%–
SAGE46.5%–
SREBench50.8%–
Tax Agent Bench62.3%–
Terminal-Bench 4.0 (Vals)55.0%–
Vibe Code Bench v1.188.9%–
LMArena Maths1488–
LMArena Creative Writing1462–
LMArena Instruction Following1488–
LMArena Multi-turn1487–
LMArena Longer Queries1496–
Chess Puzzles61.0%–
EBR-bench54.3%–
Mystery Game Puzzles80.0%–
DeepSWE v1.1–67.5%
CursorBench–36.1%
Terminal-Bench 4.0 (AA)56.1%13.1%
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (AA)–84.3%
AutomationBench64.9%–
GDP.pdf31.0%–
MLCR33.9%–
Harvey LAB6.9%–
AA-Omniscience: accuracy62.1%41.9%
AA-Omniscience: non-hallucination45.7%76.0%
AA-Briefcase v1.11557–

Data as of 2026-10-11. Best configuration of each model; every score links to its source on the model pages.

GPT-6.1 Sol vs Grok 4.6: questions

Is GPT-6.1 Sol better than Grok 4.6?
GPT-6.1 Sol (max) leads on quality: 69.3 vs 64.2. The BenchLeader Index combines every independent quality benchmark; GPT-6.1 Sol (max) is ahead overall as of 2026-10-11, but check the category scores for your use.
Is GPT-6.1 Sol better than Grok 4.6 for coding?
GPT-6.1 Sol scores higher in coding (72 vs 61 on the category index, where 50 is average).
Is GPT-6.1 Sol better than Grok 4.6 for agentic tasks?
Grok 4.6 scores higher in agentic tasks (74 vs 64 on the category index, where 50 is average).
Which is cheaper, GPT-6.1 Sol or Grok 4.6?
Grok 4.6 is cheaper: $3.00 against $4.00 per million tokens, blended at three input tokens per output token.
Which is faster, GPT-6.1 Sol or Grok 4.6?
GPT-6.1 Sol streams faster: 56 against 55 output tokens per second.
Which has the larger context window?
GPT-6.1 Sol accepts more context: 1.1M against 500k tokens.