GPT-6 Sol vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro
GPT-6 Sol 
MiMo-V2.6-Pro Verdict
- GPT-6 Sol (max) leads on quality: 67.2 vs 64.3.
- GPT-6 Sol (max) is stronger in agents & tools, coding, knowledge, multimodal, reasoning.
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro is stronger in composite, long context.
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro is 7.3× cheaper ($0.548 vs $4.00 per 1M blended).
- GPT-6 Sol (max) streams 2.3× faster (126 vs 54 tokens per second).
| Metric | GPT-6 Sol (max) | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| BenchLeader Index | 67.2 | 64.3 |
| Agents & tools score | 69.5 | 55.1 |
| Coding score | 66.4 | – |
| Composite score | 74.5 | 84.8 |
| Knowledge score | 75.4 | 66.8 |
| Long context score | 67.7 | 69.1 |
| Multimodal score | 67.1 | – |
| Reasoning score | 95.0 | 88.8 |
| Blended price $/M | $4.00 | $0.548 |
| Output speed | 126 tok/s | 54 tok/s |
| Time to first answer | 107.2 s | 39.8 s |
| Context window | 1.1M | 1.0M |
| LiveBench | 79.3% | – |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 88.7% | – |
| LiveBench Coding | 81.8% | – |
| LiveBench Agentic Coding | 52.9% | – |
| LiveBench Mathematics | 96.4% | – |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 81.2% | – |
| LiveBench Language | 85.3% | – |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 68.6% | – |
| AA Intelligence Index | 47.5 | 46.3 |
| AA-LCR | 83.7% | 86.3% |
| MMMU-Pro | 83.3% | – |
| AA-Omniscience | 27.1 | 8.4 |
| Humanity's Last Exam (AA) | 47.9% | 49.4% |
| SciCode (AA) | 57.6% | 60.9% |
| IOI | 82.6% | – |
| Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals) | 83.2% | 67.8% |
| Vals Index | 62.6 | 59.7 |
| CritPt | 30.9% | 26.6% |
| GDPval (AA) | 49.4% | 58.7% |
| BioMysteryBench | 74.8% | – |
| Code Migration | 57.2% | 43.0% |
| Excel Modeling Benchmark | 71.5% | 62.9% |
| Finance Agent v2 | 49.0% | 58.3% |
| Harvey's Legal Agent Benchmark | 1.7% | 10.8% |
| Legal Research Bench | 28.9% | 47.1% |
| MedCode | 47.1% | – |
| MedScribe | 82.0% | – |
| ProgramBench | 2.0% | – |
| Public Benefits Bench | 56.6% | – |
| SAGE | 44.8% | – |
| Tax Agent Bench | 53.0% | – |
| Terminal-Bench Science | – | 2.9% |
| Vibe Code Bench v1.1 | 87.8% | 85.2% |
| Terminal-Bench 4.0 (AA) | 43.9% | 34.9% |
| AutomationBench | 61.6% | 58.6% |
| GDP.pdf | 24.8% | 19.2% |
| MLCR | 16.1% | – |
| AA-Omniscience: accuracy | 54.5% | 34.9% |
| AA-Omniscience: non-hallucination | 39.9% | 59.4% |
| AA-Briefcase | 1483 | 1522 |
Data as of 2026-09-23. Best configuration of each model; every score links to its source on the model pages.
GPT-6 Sol vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro: questions
- Is GPT-6 Sol better than MiMo-V2.6-Pro?
- GPT-6 Sol (max) leads on quality: 67.2 vs 64.3. The BenchLeader Index combines every independent quality benchmark; GPT-6 Sol (max) is ahead overall as of 2026-09-23, but check the category scores for your use.
- Is GPT-6 Sol better than MiMo-V2.6-Pro for agentic tasks?
- GPT-6 Sol scores higher in agentic tasks (70 vs 55 on the category index, where 50 is average).
- Which is cheaper, GPT-6 Sol or MiMo-V2.6-Pro?
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro is cheaper: $0.548 against $4.00 per million tokens, blended at three input tokens per output token.
- Which is faster, GPT-6 Sol or MiMo-V2.6-Pro?
- GPT-6 Sol streams faster: 126 against 54 output tokens per second.
- Which has the larger context window?
- GPT-6 Sol accepts more context: 1.1M against 1.0M tokens.